Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Assert failure with ICU support - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Jeff Davis
Subject Re: Assert failure with ICU support
Date
Msg-id c480b495be592d600504b99e70745ed8f43c877b.camel@j-davis.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Assert failure with ICU support  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Assert failure with ICU support
List pgsql-bugs
Tree view 
On Wed, 2023-04-19 at 16:45 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> +       if (c >= 0x100 || !iscalnum(c))

I'm curious why you say >= 0x100 rather than >= 0x80?

What's the purpose of the error? Is it to catch mistakes, or is it to
reserve room for adding new escape sequences in the future?

Regards,
    Jeff Davis

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Junwang Zhao
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #17903: There is a bug in the KeepLogSeg()
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Assert failure with ICU support