Re: Reporting script runtimes in pg_regress - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Reporting script runtimes in pg_regress
Date
Msg-id c839aacf-d480-b4e6-7212-f0c66ff05927@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Reporting script runtimes in pg_regress  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Reporting script runtimes in pg_regress
List pgsql-hackers
On 2019-02-15 15:54, Tom Lane wrote:
>> We should also strive to align "FAILED" properly.
> Hmm.  The reasonable ways to accomplish that look to be either
> (a) pad "ok" to the width of "FAILED", or (b) rely on emitting a tab.
> I don't much like either, especially from the localization angle.
> One should also note that FAILED often comes along with additional
> verbiage, such as "(ignored)" or a note about process exit status;
> so I think making such cases line up totally neatly is a lost cause
> anyway.

Yeah, not strictly required, but someone might want to play around with
it a bit.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Use varargs macro for CACHEDEBUG
Next
From: Michael Banck
Date:
Subject: Re: Progress reporting for pg_verify_checksums