Re: Logging parallel worker draught - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Benoit Lobréau
Subject Re: Logging parallel worker draught
Date
Msg-id f4962c2a-69a6-8c1d-b79a-37c59785f2b0@dalibo.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Logging parallel worker draught  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 4/22/23 13:06, Amit Kapila wrote:
> I don't think introducing a GUC for this is a good idea. We can
> directly output this message in the server log either at LOG or DEBUG1
> level.

Hi,

Sorry for the delayed answer, I was away from my computer for a few 
days. I don't mind removing the guc, but I would like to keep it at the 
LOG level. When I do audits most client are at that level and setting it 
to DEBUG1 whould add too much log for them on the long run.

I'll post the corresponding patch asap.

-- 
Benoit Lobréau
Consultant
http://dalibo.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Denis Laxalde
Date:
Subject: Re: Add PQsendSyncMessage() to libpq
Next
From: Daniel Gustafsson
Date:
Subject: Re: Testing autovacuum wraparound (including failsafe)