i would say have both, but just mention that for performance reasons its better to use triggers.
On Nov 29, 2007 8:29 PM, Michael Paesold <mpaesold@gmx.at > wrote:
NikhilS wrote: >> The argument I made for keeping the example around is not > dependent on >> the assumption that using a rule is a good idea. It's dependent on >> the established fact that we have recommended that in prior >> releases, and therefore people are going to be seeing that >> construct in real databases. > > And they could refer back to the older version of the documentation > for it. In fact, we should mention that in the patch: > > <note><para>If you have a partitioning setup that uses rules please > refer to the 8.2 documentation on partitioning</para></note> > > +1
I would also add another sentence about *why* the recommendation was changed. We have one rule-based setup here, and it has been working flawlessly for us,... so personally I don't even know the reasons.
Best Regards Michael Paesold
---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
