Hi,
On 2025-06-05 12:47:52 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> > I think this is a big enough pitfall that it's, obviously assuming the patch
> > has a sensible complexity, worth fixing this in 18. RMT, anyone, what do you
> > think?
>
> Let's see the patch ... but yeah, I'd rather not ship 18 like this.
I've attached a first draft.
I can't make heads or tails of the ordering in configure.ac, so the function
test is probably in the wrong place.
Greetings,
Andres
