Re: autovacuum strategy / parameters - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From akp geek
Subject Re: autovacuum strategy / parameters
Date
Msg-id x2o2024a9fb1004280737gb35a3065uad2e6007bdff1993@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: autovacuum strategy / parameters  (Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: autovacuum strategy / parameters
Re: autovacuum strategy / parameters
List pgsql-performance
Hi -
           don't want to side track the discussion. We have 8.4, which of AUTOVACUUM PARAMETERS can be set to handle individual table?  I ran into bloat with small table only. Now the issue is being resolved.
 
Regards
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 10:20 AM, Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater@gmx.net> wrote:
Rick, 22.04.2010 22:42:


So, in a large table, the scale_factor is the dominant term. In a
small table, the threshold is the dominant term. But both are taken into
account.

The default values are set for small tables; it is not being run for
large tables.

With 8.4 you can adjust the autovacuum settings per table...





--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Kellerer
Date:
Subject: Re: autovacuum strategy / parameters
Next
From: Kenneth Marshall
Date:
Subject: Re: autovacuum strategy / parameters