Sezai YILMAZ <sezaiy@ata.cs.hun.edu.tr> writes:
> Justin Clift wrote:
> >
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> > >
> > > Sezai YILMAZ <sezaiy@ata.cs.hun.edu.tr> writes:
> > > > With Turkish locale it is not possible to write SQL queries in
> > > > CAPITAL letters. SQL identifiers like "INSERT" and "UNION" first
> > > > are downgraded to "ınsert" and Then "ınsert" and "unıon"
> > > > does not match as SQL identifier.
> > >
> > > Ugh.
> > <snip>
> >
> > How about thinking in the other direction.... is it possible for
> > PostgreSQL
> > to be able to recognised localised versions of SQL queries?
> >
> > i.e. For a Turkish locale it associates "ınsert" INSERT and "unıon"
> > with UNION.
>
> I don't have any opinion how can solve this problem. But,
> I don't agree with this solution. SQL is naturally English. I am
> against SQL to be localized.
Has anyone come up with a good solution? The last one I saw from Tom
Lane required compile-time options which isn't an option for us.
--
Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Red Hat, Inc.
