Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

2 May 2005

• 00:59   Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Oliver Jowett
• 01:08   Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Jaime Casanova
• 01:14   Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Neil Conway
• 01:25   Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Tom Lane
• 01:42   Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Tom Lane
• 02:05   Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Neil Conway
• 02:20   Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Oliver Jowett
• 02:22   Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Russell Smith
• 02:35   Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Tom Lane
• 02:57   Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Tom Lane
• 03:01   Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Tom Lane
• 03:07   Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Neil Conway
• 03:07   Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Dennis Bjorklund
• 03:52   Re: SPI bug. Thomas Hallgren
• 03:54   Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Oliver Jowett
• 03:56   Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Oliver Jowett
• 05:11   Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Peter Eisentraut
• 05:15   Re: custom guc vars Brent Verner
• 05:49   Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Oliver Jowett
• 05:52   Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 
• 05:58   Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 
• 06:12   Using LDAP for authorization Magnus Hagander
• 06:12   Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 
• 06:14   Re: custom guc vars Thomas Hallgren
• 06:29   Re: SPI bug. Thomas Hallgren
• 06:36   Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 
• 06:53   Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 
• 07:01   Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 
• 07:52   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Hannu Krosing
• 07:52   Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Hannu Krosing
• 07:59   Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Hannu Krosing
• 08:23   Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 
• 08:25   Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 
• 08:32   Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Alvar Freude
• 08:54   Re: How to make lazy VACUUM of one table run in several Hannu Krosing
• 10:25   Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 
• 10:39   Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Christopher Browne
• 10:39   Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Christopher Browne
• 10:41   Python James William Pye
• 10:41   Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Christopher Browne
• 10:41   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Christopher Browne
• 11:34   Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Tom Lane
• 11:38   Re: How to make lazy VACUUM of one table run in several transactions ? Tom Lane
• 11:41   Re: Using LDAP for authorization Stephen Frost
• 11:58   Re: pg_locks needs a facelift Merlin Moncure
• 12:00   Re: SPI bug. Tom Lane
• 12:00   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Dave Held
• 12:07   Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Tom Lane
• 12:37   Re: SPI bug. Thomas Hallgren
• 12:38   Re: pg_locks needs a facelift Tom Lane
• 12:48   Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Heikki Linnakangas
• 13:48   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Josh Berkus
• 13:51   Re: How to make lazy VACUUM of one table run in several Hannu Krosing
• 13:53   ARCHIVE TABLES (was: possible TODO: read-only tables, select from indexes only.) Hannu Krosing
• 14:13   Re: pg_locks needs a facelift Merlin Moncure
• 14:14   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Bruce Momjian
• 14:17   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Bruce Momjian
• 14:21   Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 
• 14:23   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Marc G. Fournier
• 14:23   Re: pg_locks needs a facelift Alvaro Herrera
• 14:28   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Bruce Momjian
• 14:30   Re: pg_locks needs a facelift Tom Lane
• 14:32   Citation for "Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested?" Gurmeet Manku
• 14:33   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Joshua D. Drake
• 14:39   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Dave Held
• 14:47   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Joshua D. Drake
• 14:48   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Bruce Momjian
• 14:54   Re: pg_locks needs a facelift Merlin Moncure
• 14:54   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Dave Held
• 14:56   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Bruce Momjian
• 14:57   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Joshua D. Drake
• 14:59   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Bruce Momjian
• 15:12   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Marc G. Fournier
• 15:13   Re: pg_locks needs a facelift Merlin Moncure
• 15:13   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Bruce Momjian
• 15:14   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Bruce Momjian
• 15:15   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Decision Process WAS: Increased company involvement Josh Berkus
• 15:27   Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Andrew - Supernews
• 15:35   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Decision Process WAS: Increased Marc G. Fournier
• 15:37   Re: pg_locks needs a facelift Tom Lane
• 15:39   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Marc G. Fournier
• 15:40   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Decision Process WAS: Increased Joshua D. Drake
• 15:42   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Bruce Momjian
• 15:44   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Decision Process WAS: Increased company involvement Dave Held
• 15:44   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Decision Process WAS: Increased company involvement Josh Berkus
• 15:50   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Decision Process WAS: Increased company involvement Tom Lane
• 15:52   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Marc G. Fournier
• 15:55   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Bruce Momjian
• 16:00   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Joshua D. Drake
• 16:04   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Marc G. Fournier
• 16:05   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Joshua D. Drake
• 16:07   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Decision Process WAS: Increased company Andrew Dunstan
• 16:08   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Decision Process WAS: Increased company involvement Josh Berkus
• 16:13   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Tom Lane
• 16:14   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Marc G. Fournier
• 16:19   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Joshua D. Drake
• 16:21   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Chris Travers
• 16:23   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Decision Process WAS: Increased company Bruce Momjian
• 16:24   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Bruce Momjian
• 16:25   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Dann Corbit
• 16:25   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Bruce Momjian
• 16:28   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Decision Process WAS: Increased company involvement Robert Treat
• 16:29   Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Rob Butler
• 16:31   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Marc G. Fournier
• 16:45   Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Bruno Wolff III
• 16:51   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Bruce Momjian
• 16:54   Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Andrew - Supernews
• 16:57   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Decision Process WAS: Increased company Bruce Momjian
• 17:00   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Marc G. Fournier
• 17:05   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Joshua D. Drake
• 17:08   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Bruce Momjian
• 17:13   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Joshua D. Drake
• 17:14   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Marc G. Fournier
• 17:16   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Tom Lane
• 17:17   Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Tom Lane
• 17:20   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Jim C. Nasby
• 17:27   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Andrew Dunstan
• 17:34   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Decision Process WAS: Increased company Bruce Momjian
• 17:36   PostgreSQL Guru needed: $70K - $80K year!! PeterS
• 17:38   Re: pg_locks needs a facelift Merlin Moncure
• 17:40   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Ron Mayer
• 17:43   Re: pg_locks needs a facelift Jim C. Nasby
• 17:43   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Joshua D. Drake
• 17:45   Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 
• 17:47   Re: pg_locks needs a facelift Jim C. Nasby
• 17:54   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Andrew Dunstan
• 17:56   Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Alvar Freude
• 17:58   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Decision Process WAS: Increased company Rosser Schwarz
• 17:59   Re: ARCHIVE TABLES (was: possible TODO: read-only tables, select from indexes only.) Jim C. Nasby
• 18:01   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Decision Process WAS: Increased company Rosser Schwarz
• 18:02   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Jim C. Nasby
• 18:06   Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Jim C. Nasby
• 18:11   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Andrew Dunstan
• 18:32   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Decision Process WAS: Increased company involvement Dave Held
• 18:35   Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Oliver Jowett
• 18:39   Re: pg_locks needs a facelift Alvaro Herrera
• 18:39   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Alvaro Herrera
• 18:51   Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Oliver Jowett
• 18:56   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Decision Process WAS: Increased company involvement Dave Held
• 18:57   Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Chuck McDevitt
• 18:59   Re: ARCHIVE TABLES (was: possible TODO: read-only tables, select from indexes only.) Jochem van Dieten
• 19:03   Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Kris Jurka
• 19:06   Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Oliver Jowett
• 19:13   Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Chuck McDevitt
• 20:22   Heads up: impending 8.0, 7.4, 7.3 releases Tom Lane
• 20:33   Re: Heads up: impending 8.0, 7.4, 7.3 releases Joshua D. Drake
• 21:02   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Decision Process WAS: Increased company involvement Robert Treat
• 21:53   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Decision Process WAS: Increased company involvement Andrew Dunstan
• 22:02   Re: SPI bug. Neil Conway
• 23:43   Re: pg_locks needs a facelift Tom Lane