Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

5 June 2017

• 00:12   Re: [HACKERS] Continuous buildfarm failures on hamster with bin-check Noah Misch
• 00:16   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 10 changes in exclusion constraints - did something change? CASE WHEN behavior oddity Mark Dilger
• 00:19   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 10 changes in exclusion constraints - didsomething change? CASE WHEN behavior oddity Andres Freund
• 00:30   [HACKERS] Make ANALYZE more selective about what is a "most common value"? Tom Lane
• 00:32   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 10 changes in exclusion constraints - did something change? CASE WHEN behavior oddity Mark Dilger
• 01:24   [HACKERS] Re: BUG #14680: startup process on standby encounter a deadlock ofTwoPhaseStateLock when redo 2PC xlog Noah Misch
• 01:30   Re: retry shm attach for windows (WAS: Re: [HACKERS] OK, so culicidae is *still* broken) Tom Lane
• 01:33   Re: [HACKERS] BUG #14682: row level security not work with partitioned table Noah Misch
• 01:45   [HACKERS] Re: Error while creating subscription when server is running insingle user mode Noah Misch
• 01:49   Re: [HACKERS] Server ignores contents of SASLInitialResponse Noah Misch
• 02:00   [HACKERS] Should we standardize on a type for signal handler flags? Andres Freund
• 02:13   Re: [HACKERS] Should we standardize on a type for signal handler flags? Michael Paquier
• 02:14   Re: [HACKERS] Should we standardize on a type for signal handler flags? Tom Lane
• 02:21   Re: [HACKERS] Should we standardize on a type for signal handlerflags? Andres Freund
• 02:26   Re: [HACKERS] Should we standardize on a type for signal handler flags? Tom Lane
• 04:08   Re: [HACKERS] logical replication - still unstable after all thesemonths Mark Kirkwood
• 04:09   [HACKERS] Support to COMMENT ON DATABASE CURRENT_DATABASE Jing Wang
• 04:28   [HACKERS] Re: BUG #14680: startup process on standby encounter a deadlock ofTwoPhaseStateLock when redo 2PC xlog Michael Paquier
• 04:29   Re: [HACKERS] logical replication and PANIC during shutdowncheckpoint in publisher Andres Freund
• 04:30   Re: [HACKERS] Support to COMMENT ON DATABASE CURRENT_DATABASE Michael Paquier
• 04:31   Re: [HACKERS] logical replication and PANIC during shutdowncheckpoint in publisher Michael Paquier
• 04:42   Re: [HACKERS] logical replication and PANIC during shutdowncheckpoint in publisher Andres Freund
• 05:01   Re: [HACKERS] logical replication - still unstable after all thesemonths Mark Kirkwood
• 05:18   Re: [HACKERS] sketchy partcollation handling Amit Langote
• 05:38   Re: [HACKERS] logical replication - still unstable after all thesemonths Petr Jelinek
• 05:52   [HACKERS] Fix a typo in README.dependencies atorikoshi
• 06:20   Re: retry shm attach for windows (WAS: Re: [HACKERS] OK, so culicidaeis *still* broken) Amit Kapila
• 06:45   Re: retry shm attach for windows (WAS: Re: [HACKERS] OK, so culicidae is *still* broken) Tom Lane
• 07:20   Re: [HACKERS] Support to COMMENT ON DATABASE CURRENT_DATABASE Jing Wang
• 08:02   Re: [HACKERS] BEFORE trigger can cause undetected partitionconstraint violation Amit Langote
• 08:55   Re: [HACKERS] proposal psql \gdesc Pavel Stehule
• 08:57   Re: [HACKERS] UPDATE of partition key Amit Kapila
• 09:30   Re: [HACKERS] logical replication and PANIC during shutdowncheckpoint in publisher Michael Paquier
• 09:34   Re: [HACKERS] Server ignores contents of SASLInitialResponse Michael Paquier
• 09:51   Re: [HACKERS] UPDATE of partition key Amit Kapila
• 09:53   Re: [HACKERS] UPDATE of partition key Amit Khandekar
• 10:02   Re: [HACKERS] proposal psql \gdesc Fabien COELHO
• 11:10   Re: [HACKERS] simplehash.h typo Heikki Linnakangas
• 11:14   Re: [HACKERS] Server ignores contents of SASLInitialResponse Heikki Linnakangas
• 11:25   Re: [HACKERS] Bug in ExecModifyTable function and trigger issues forforeign tables Etsuro Fujita
• 11:26   Re: [HACKERS] simplehash.h typo Andres Freund
• 11:32   Re: [HACKERS] simplehash.h typo Heikki Linnakangas
• 11:39   Re: [HACKERS] Bug in ExecModifyTable function and trigger issues forforeign tables Ashutosh Bapat
• 11:45   [HACKERS] Update comments in nodeModifyTable.c Etsuro Fujita
• 11:49   [HACKERS] Challenges preventing us moving to 64 bit transaction id (XID)? Tianzhou Chen
• 12:08   Re: [HACKERS] Challenges preventing us moving to 64 bit transactionid (XID)? Heikki Linnakangas
• 12:23   Re: [HACKERS] make check false success Sandro Santilli
• 12:25   Re: [HACKERS] Bug in ExecModifyTable function and trigger issues forforeign tables Etsuro Fujita
• 14:16   Re: retry shm attach for windows (WAS: Re: [HACKERS] OK, so culicidaeis *still* broken) Amit Kapila
• 14:28   Re: retry shm attach for windows (WAS: Re: [HACKERS] OK, so culicidaeis *still* broken) Magnus Hagander
• 14:35   Re: retry shm attach for windows (WAS: Re: [HACKERS] OK, so culicidaeis *still* broken) Amit Kapila
• 14:38   Re: retry shm attach for windows (WAS: Re: [HACKERS] OK, so culicidaeis *still* broken) Magnus Hagander
• 14:58   Re: [HACKERS] Proposal : For Auto-Prewarm. Rafia Sabih
• 15:24   Re: [HACKERS] Fix a typo in README.dependencies Ashutosh Bapat
• 16:22   [HACKERS] Fix performance degradation of contended LWLock on NUMA Sokolov Yura
• 16:49   Re: [HACKERS] make check false success Tom Lane
• 16:56   Re: retry shm attach for windows (WAS: Re: [HACKERS] OK, so culicidae is *still* broken) Tom Lane
• 17:07   Re: [HACKERS] PG10 transition tables, wCTEs and multiple operationson the same table Robert Haas
• 17:15   Re: [HACKERS] PG10 transition tables, wCTEs and multiple operations on the same table Tom Lane
• 17:19   Re: [HACKERS] PG10 transition tables, wCTEs and multiple operationson the same table Robert Haas
• 17:20   [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] BUG #14682: row level security not work with partitionedtable Joe Conway
• 17:36   Re: [HACKERS] Proposal : For Auto-Prewarm. Robert Haas
• 17:36   Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] BUG #14682: row level security not work with partitioned table Robert Haas
• 17:40   [HACKERS] intermittent failures in Cygwin from select_parallel tests Andrew Dunstan
• 17:59   Re: [HACKERS] intermittent failures in Cygwin from select_parallel tests Tom Lane
• 18:14   Re: [HACKERS] Default Partition for Range Dilip Kumar
• 18:19   [HACKERS] shm_toc_lookup API Tom Lane
• 18:36   Re: [HACKERS] shm_toc_lookup API Robert Haas
• 18:42   Re: [HACKERS] make check false success Robert Haas
• 19:19   Re: [HACKERS] shm_toc_lookup API Tom Lane
• 20:00   Re: [HACKERS] Make ANALYZE more selective about what is a "mostcommon value"? Robert Haas
• 20:10   Re: [HACKERS] shm_toc_lookup API Robert Haas
• 20:40   [HACKERS] GSoC 2017 weekly progress reports ("Explicitly support predicatelocks in index access methods besides b-tree") Shubham Barai
• 21:37   [HACKERS] postgres_fdw cost estimation defaults and documentation Jeff Janes
• 21:57   Re: [HACKERS] shm_toc_lookup API Tom Lane
• 22:02   Re: [HACKERS] shm_toc_lookup API Andres Freund
• 22:06   Re: [HACKERS] shm_toc_lookup API Tom Lane
• 22:06   Re: [HACKERS] PROVE_FLAGS Andrew Dunstan
• 22:10   Re: [HACKERS] shm_toc_lookup API Andres Freund
• 22:30   [HACKERS] HACKERS[PROPOSAL] split ProcArrayLock into multiple parts Jim Van Fleet
• 22:32   Re: [HACKERS] Why does logical replication launcher setapplication_name? Petr Jelinek
• 22:34   Re: [HACKERS] Make ANALYZE more selective about what is a "most common value"? Tom Lane
• 23:11   Re: [HACKERS] HACKERS[PROPOSAL] split ProcArrayLock into multipleparts Sokolov Yura
• 23:26   Re: [HACKERS] HACKERS[PROPOSAL] split ProcArrayLock into multipleparts Sokolov Yura
• 23:36   Re: [HACKERS] HACKERS[PROPOSAL] split ProcArrayLock into multiple parts Jim Van Fleet