Mailing lists [pgsql-performance]

6 April 2004

• 02:46   Re: possible improvement between G4 and G5 Tom Lane
• 04:26   Re: performance comparission postgresql/ms-sql server Shridhar Daithankar
• 05:04   good pc but bad performance,why? huang yaqin
• 08:15   Re: good pc but bad performance,why? Richard Huxton
• 09:46   Re: good pc but bad performance,why? Bill Moran
• 10:00   Back to Linux 2.6 kernel thoughts... Richard Huxton
• 11:40   Re: performance comparission postgresql/ms-sql server Shridhar Daithankar
• 11:42   Re: performance comparission postgresql/ms-sql server Kaarel
• 12:01   Wierd issues Andrew Matthews
• 12:42   Re: good pc but bad performance,why? Tom Lane
• 12:53   Re: possible improvement between G4 and G5 Jim C. Nasby
• 13:22   Re: possible improvement between G4 and G5 Aaron Werman
• 15:51   Re: possible improvement between G4 and G5 Josh Berkus
• 16:16   Re: good pc but bad performance,why? Stefan Kaltenbrunner
• 17:22   Re: possible improvement between G4 and G5 Aaron Werman
• 17:26   plan problem Ken Geis
• 18:42   Re: possible improvement between G4 and G5 Josh Berkus