Mailing lists [pgsql-performance]

7 April 2004

• 01:03   Re: good pc but bad performance,why? huang yaqin
• 04:15   Re: performance comparission postgresql/ms-sql server Heiko Kehlenbrink
• 04:19   Re: [ADMIN] Raw devices vs. Filesystems Grega Bremec
• 05:33   Re: good pc but bad performance,why? Richard Huxton
• 05:38   Re: plan problem Richard Huxton
• 06:00   Re: good pc but bad performance,why? huang yaqin
• 06:03   Re: plan problem Ken Geis
• 06:54   Re: good pc but bad performance,why? Dennis Bjorklund
• 07:41   Re: good pc but bad performance,why? Steven Butler
• 08:30   Re: good pc but bad performance,why? Andrew McMillan
• 08:54   Re: good pc but bad performance,why? Shridhar Daithankar
• 09:31   Re: plan problem Richard Huxton
• 11:36   Re: good pc but bad performance,why? Aaron Werman
• 13:09   Re: [ADMIN] Raw devices vs. Filesystems Josh Berkus
• 13:37   Re: [ADMIN] Raw devices vs. Filesystems Steve Atkins
• 14:07   Re: PostgreSQL and Linux 2.6 kernel. Neil Conway
• 16:10   Postgresql educational sources Nid
• 16:54   Re: good pc but bad performance,why? scott.marlowe
• 17:28   Re: Postgresql educational sources scott.marlowe
• 18:05   statistics Jaime Casanova
• 19:12   Re: good pc but bad performance,why? Bruce Momjian
• 20:48   Re: statistics Paul Thomas
• 22:31   Re: good pc but bad performance,why? Tom Lane
• 22:33   Re: good pc but bad performance,why? Bruce Momjian
• 23:13   Re: good pc but bad performance,why? Tom Lane