Thread: Fixed some compiler warnings
--

Mobile: +91 976-788-8246
Attachment
Hi DaveI have fixed some compiler warnings which we are facing on OSX Mavericks. Attached is the patch file. Can you please review it.If patch looks good to you then can you please commit it.
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
HiOn Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 9:35 AM, Akshay Joshi <akshay.joshi@enterprisedb.com> wrote:Hi DaveI have fixed some compiler warnings which we are facing on OSX Mavericks. Attached is the patch file. Can you please review it.If patch looks good to you then can you please commit it.It mostly looks good, but what's with the operator changes? Why is it complaining about x >= 0 ?
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Mobile: +91 976-788-8246
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 7:35 PM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:HiOn Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 9:35 AM, Akshay Joshi <akshay.joshi@enterprisedb.com> wrote:Hi DaveI have fixed some compiler warnings which we are facing on OSX Mavericks. Attached is the patch file. Can you please review it.If patch looks good to you then can you please commit it.It mostly looks good, but what's with the operator changes? Why is it complaining about x >= 0 ?In all such cases x is unsigned int and compiler complaining about condition "x >=0" will always true.
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 6:03 AM, Akshay Joshi <akshay.joshi@enterprisedb.com> wrote:On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 7:35 PM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:HiOn Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 9:35 AM, Akshay Joshi <akshay.joshi@enterprisedb.com> wrote:Hi DaveI have fixed some compiler warnings which we are facing on OSX Mavericks. Attached is the patch file. Can you please review it.If patch looks good to you then can you please commit it.It mostly looks good, but what's with the operator changes? Why is it complaining about x >= 0 ?In all such cases x is unsigned int and compiler complaining about condition "x >=0" will always true.Ahh yes. However, the proposed fix will always evaluate to true won't it?if (i > 0 || i == 0){}
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Mobile: +91 976-788-8246
wxGetSingleChoiceIndex returns integer not "unsigned integer"
if (i > 0 || i == 0)
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 7:26 PM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 6:03 AM, Akshay Joshi <akshay.joshi@enterprisedb.com> wrote:On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 7:35 PM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:HiOn Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 9:35 AM, Akshay Joshi <akshay.joshi@enterprisedb.com> wrote:Hi DaveI have fixed some compiler warnings which we are facing on OSX Mavericks. Attached is the patch file. Can you please review it.If patch looks good to you then can you please commit it.It mostly looks good, but what's with the operator changes? Why is it complaining about x >= 0 ?In all such cases x is unsigned int and compiler complaining about condition "x >=0" will always true.Ahh yes. However, the proposed fix will always evaluate to true won't it?if (i > 0 || i == 0){}Yes it will, but in this case compiler didn't generate any warning.--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company--Akshay JoshiPrincipal Software EngineerPhone: +91 20-3058-9517
Mobile: +91 976-788-8246
--
--
Thanks & Regards,
Ashesh Vashi
EnterpriseDB INDIA: Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Akshay,
wxGetSingleChoiceIndex returns integer not "unsigned integer"And, this syntax is definitely wrong in any case for unsigned integers
if (i > 0 || i == 0)--On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Akshay Joshi <akshay.joshi@enterprisedb.com> wrote:On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 7:26 PM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 6:03 AM, Akshay Joshi <akshay.joshi@enterprisedb.com> wrote:On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 7:35 PM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:HiOn Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 9:35 AM, Akshay Joshi <akshay.joshi@enterprisedb.com> wrote:Hi DaveI have fixed some compiler warnings which we are facing on OSX Mavericks. Attached is the patch file. Can you please review it.If patch looks good to you then can you please commit it.It mostly looks good, but what's with the operator changes? Why is it complaining about x >= 0 ?In all such cases x is unsigned int and compiler complaining about condition "x >=0" will always true.Ahh yes. However, the proposed fix will always evaluate to true won't it?if (i > 0 || i == 0){}Yes it will, but in this case compiler didn't generate any warning.--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company--Akshay JoshiPrincipal Software EngineerPhone: +91 20-3058-9517
Mobile: +91 976-788-8246
--Thanks & Regards,
Ashesh Vashi
EnterpriseDB INDIA: Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Mobile: +91 976-788-8246
Attachment
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 7:26 PM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 6:03 AM, Akshay Joshi <akshay.joshi@enterprisedb.com> wrote:On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 7:35 PM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:HiOn Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 9:35 AM, Akshay Joshi <akshay.joshi@enterprisedb.com> wrote:Hi DaveI have fixed some compiler warnings which we are facing on OSX Mavericks. Attached is the patch file. Can you please review it.If patch looks good to you then can you please commit it.It mostly looks good, but what's with the operator changes? Why is it complaining about x >= 0 ?In all such cases x is unsigned int and compiler complaining about condition "x >=0" will always true.Ahh yes. However, the proposed fix will always evaluate to true won't it?if (i > 0 || i == 0){}Yes it will, but in this case compiler didn't generate any warning.
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Thanks Ashesh,On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 11:49 AM, Ashesh Vashi <ashesh.vashi@enterprisedb.com> wrote:Akshay,
wxGetSingleChoiceIndex returns integer not "unsigned integer"And, this syntax is definitely wrong in any case for unsigned integersFixed the above by changing the data type from "unsigned int" to "int", but for the other cases in the patch where I have applied the logiclike if (i > 0 || i==0) to fix compiler warnings, we have already discussed the same solution on Friday.Attached is the modified patch.
if (i > 0 || i == 0)--On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Akshay Joshi <akshay.joshi@enterprisedb.com> wrote:On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 7:26 PM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 6:03 AM, Akshay Joshi <akshay.joshi@enterprisedb.com> wrote:On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 7:35 PM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:HiOn Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 9:35 AM, Akshay Joshi <akshay.joshi@enterprisedb.com> wrote:Hi DaveI have fixed some compiler warnings which we are facing on OSX Mavericks. Attached is the patch file. Can you please review it.If patch looks good to you then can you please commit it.It mostly looks good, but what's with the operator changes? Why is it complaining about x >= 0 ?In all such cases x is unsigned int and compiler complaining about condition "x >=0" will always true.Ahh yes. However, the proposed fix will always evaluate to true won't it?if (i > 0 || i == 0){}Yes it will, but in this case compiler didn't generate any warning.--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
--Thanks & Regards,
Ashesh Vashi
EnterpriseDB INDIA: Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 6:50 AM, Akshay Joshi <akshay.joshi@enterprisedb.com> wrote:Thanks Ashesh,On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 11:49 AM, Ashesh Vashi <ashesh.vashi@enterprisedb.com> wrote:Akshay,
wxGetSingleChoiceIndex returns integer not "unsigned integer"And, this syntax is definitely wrong in any case for unsigned integersFixed the above by changing the data type from "unsigned int" to "int", but for the other cases in the patch where I have applied the logiclike if (i > 0 || i==0) to fix compiler warnings, we have already discussed the same solution on Friday.Attached is the modified patch.What did you discuss on Friday?
if (i > 0 || i == 0)--On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Akshay Joshi <akshay.joshi@enterprisedb.com> wrote:On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 7:26 PM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 6:03 AM, Akshay Joshi <akshay.joshi@enterprisedb.com> wrote:On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 7:35 PM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:HiOn Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 9:35 AM, Akshay Joshi <akshay.joshi@enterprisedb.com> wrote:Hi DaveI have fixed some compiler warnings which we are facing on OSX Mavericks. Attached is the patch file. Can you please review it.If patch looks good to you then can you please commit it.It mostly looks good, but what's with the operator changes? Why is it complaining about x >= 0 ?In all such cases x is unsigned int and compiler complaining about condition "x >=0" will always true.Ahh yes. However, the proposed fix will always evaluate to true won't it?if (i > 0 || i == 0){}Yes it will, but in this case compiler didn't generate any warning.--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
--Thanks & Regards,
Ashesh Vashi
EnterpriseDB INDIA: Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Mobile: +91 976-788-8246
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 6:50 AM, Akshay Joshi <akshay.joshi@enterprisedb.com> wrote:Thanks Ashesh,On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 11:49 AM, Ashesh Vashi <ashesh.vashi@enterprisedb.com> wrote:Akshay,
wxGetSingleChoiceIndex returns integer not "unsigned integer"And, this syntax is definitely wrong in any case for unsigned integersFixed the above by changing the data type from "unsigned int" to "int", but for the other cases in the patch where I have applied the logiclike if (i > 0 || i==0) to fix compiler warnings, we have already discussed the same solution on Friday.Attached is the modified patch.What did you discuss on Friday?To fix compiler warnings we have to modify the condition in such a way that it will work. So we talked about modifying the condition like "((i > 0 || i ==0) && i != (size_t)-1)".
if (i > 0 || i == 0)--On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Akshay Joshi <akshay.joshi@enterprisedb.com> wrote:On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 7:26 PM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 6:03 AM, Akshay Joshi <akshay.joshi@enterprisedb.com> wrote:On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 7:35 PM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:HiOn Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 9:35 AM, Akshay Joshi <akshay.joshi@enterprisedb.com> wrote:Hi DaveI have fixed some compiler warnings which we are facing on OSX Mavericks. Attached is the patch file. Can you please review it.If patch looks good to you then can you please commit it.It mostly looks good, but what's with the operator changes? Why is it complaining about x >= 0 ?In all such cases x is unsigned int and compiler complaining about condition "x >=0" will always true.Ahh yes. However, the proposed fix will always evaluate to true won't it?if (i > 0 || i == 0){}Yes it will, but in this case compiler didn't generate any warning.--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
--Thanks & Regards,
Ashesh Vashi
EnterpriseDB INDIA: Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company--Akshay JoshiPrincipal Software EngineerPhone: +91 20-3058-9517
Mobile: +91 976-788-8246

Mobile: +91 976-788-8246
Attachment
Hi DaveI have removed the check like "if (i > 0 || i ==0)" from many places except one. I have tried to fix compiler warnings either by modifying the logic or putting some other checks. Attached is the modified patch, please review it.
if (selStart >= 0 && selStart != (size_t)(-1))
with
if (selStart != (size_t)(-1))
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Akshay Joshi <akshay.joshi@enterprisedb.com> wrote:On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 6:50 AM, Akshay Joshi <akshay.joshi@enterprisedb.com> wrote:Thanks Ashesh,On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 11:49 AM, Ashesh Vashi <ashesh.vashi@enterprisedb.com> wrote:Akshay,
wxGetSingleChoiceIndex returns integer not "unsigned integer"And, this syntax is definitely wrong in any case for unsigned integersFixed the above by changing the data type from "unsigned int" to "int", but for the other cases in the patch where I have applied the logiclike if (i > 0 || i==0) to fix compiler warnings, we have already discussed the same solution on Friday.Attached is the modified patch.What did you discuss on Friday?To fix compiler warnings we have to modify the condition in such a way that it will work. So we talked about modifying the condition like "((i > 0 || i ==0) && i != (size_t)-1)".
if (i > 0 || i == 0)--On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Akshay Joshi <akshay.joshi@enterprisedb.com> wrote:On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 7:26 PM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 6:03 AM, Akshay Joshi <akshay.joshi@enterprisedb.com> wrote:On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 7:35 PM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:HiOn Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 9:35 AM, Akshay Joshi <akshay.joshi@enterprisedb.com> wrote:Hi DaveI have fixed some compiler warnings which we are facing on OSX Mavericks. Attached is the patch file. Can you please review it.If patch looks good to you then can you please commit it.It mostly looks good, but what's with the operator changes? Why is it complaining about x >= 0 ?In all such cases x is unsigned int and compiler complaining about condition "x >=0" will always true.Ahh yes. However, the proposed fix will always evaluate to true won't it?if (i > 0 || i == 0){}Yes it will, but in this case compiler didn't generate any warning.--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
--Thanks & Regards,
Ashesh Vashi
EnterpriseDB INDIA: Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
HiOn Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 7:42 AM, Akshay Joshi <akshay.joshi@enterprisedb.com> wrote:Hi DaveI have removed the check like "if (i > 0 || i ==0)" from many places except one. I have tried to fix compiler warnings either by modifying the logic or putting some other checks. Attached is the modified patch, please review it.Any reason you can see for not just replacing:if (selStart >= 0 && selStart != (size_t)(-1))
with
if (selStart != (size_t)(-1))
Also, did you check that these changes don't introduce new warning on Windows/Linux?
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Akshay Joshi <akshay.joshi@enterprisedb.com> wrote:On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 6:50 AM, Akshay Joshi <akshay.joshi@enterprisedb.com> wrote:Thanks Ashesh,On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 11:49 AM, Ashesh Vashi <ashesh.vashi@enterprisedb.com> wrote:Akshay,
wxGetSingleChoiceIndex returns integer not "unsigned integer"And, this syntax is definitely wrong in any case for unsigned integersFixed the above by changing the data type from "unsigned int" to "int", but for the other cases in the patch where I have applied the logiclike if (i > 0 || i==0) to fix compiler warnings, we have already discussed the same solution on Friday.Attached is the modified patch.What did you discuss on Friday?To fix compiler warnings we have to modify the condition in such a way that it will work. So we talked about modifying the condition like "((i > 0 || i ==0) && i != (size_t)-1)".
if (i > 0 || i == 0)--On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Akshay Joshi <akshay.joshi@enterprisedb.com> wrote:On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 7:26 PM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 6:03 AM, Akshay Joshi <akshay.joshi@enterprisedb.com> wrote:On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 7:35 PM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:HiOn Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 9:35 AM, Akshay Joshi <akshay.joshi@enterprisedb.com> wrote:Hi DaveI have fixed some compiler warnings which we are facing on OSX Mavericks. Attached is the patch file. Can you please review it.If patch looks good to you then can you please commit it.It mostly looks good, but what's with the operator changes? Why is it complaining about x >= 0 ?In all such cases x is unsigned int and compiler complaining about condition "x >=0" will always true.Ahh yes. However, the proposed fix will always evaluate to true won't it?if (i > 0 || i == 0){}Yes it will, but in this case compiler didn't generate any warning.--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
--Thanks & Regards,
Ashesh Vashi
EnterpriseDB INDIA: Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company----
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Mobile: +91 976-788-8246
Attachment
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 7:49 PM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:HiOn Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 7:42 AM, Akshay Joshi <akshay.joshi@enterprisedb.com> wrote:Hi DaveI have removed the check like "if (i > 0 || i ==0)" from many places except one. I have tried to fix compiler warnings either by modifying the logic or putting some other checks. Attached is the modified patch, please review it.Any reason you can see for not just replacing:if (selStart >= 0 && selStart != (size_t)(-1))
with
if (selStart != (size_t)(-1))
Fixed the above. I have also fixed some more compiler warnings that I have faced on Windows. Attached is the new patch.Also, did you check that these changes don't introduce new warning on Windows/Linux?Yes. I have checked no other warnings has been introduce.On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Akshay Joshi <akshay.joshi@enterprisedb.com> wrote:On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 6:50 AM, Akshay Joshi <akshay.joshi@enterprisedb.com> wrote:Thanks Ashesh,On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 11:49 AM, Ashesh Vashi <ashesh.vashi@enterprisedb.com> wrote:Akshay,
wxGetSingleChoiceIndex returns integer not "unsigned integer"And, this syntax is definitely wrong in any case for unsigned integersFixed the above by changing the data type from "unsigned int" to "int", but for the other cases in the patch where I have applied the logiclike if (i > 0 || i==0) to fix compiler warnings, we have already discussed the same solution on Friday.Attached is the modified patch.What did you discuss on Friday?To fix compiler warnings we have to modify the condition in such a way that it will work. So we talked about modifying the condition like "((i > 0 || i ==0) && i != (size_t)-1)".
if (i > 0 || i == 0)--On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Akshay Joshi <akshay.joshi@enterprisedb.com> wrote:On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 7:26 PM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 6:03 AM, Akshay Joshi <akshay.joshi@enterprisedb.com> wrote:On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 7:35 PM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:HiOn Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 9:35 AM, Akshay Joshi <akshay.joshi@enterprisedb.com> wrote:Hi DaveI have fixed some compiler warnings which we are facing on OSX Mavericks. Attached is the patch file. Can you please review it.If patch looks good to you then can you please commit it.It mostly looks good, but what's with the operator changes? Why is it complaining about x >= 0 ?In all such cases x is unsigned int and compiler complaining about condition "x >=0" will always true.Ahh yes. However, the proposed fix will always evaluate to true won't it?if (i > 0 || i == 0){}Yes it will, but in this case compiler didn't generate any warning.--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
--Thanks & Regards,
Ashesh Vashi
EnterpriseDB INDIA: Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company----
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company