Thread: Support for non standard SSH port
<div class="messageBodyContainer isInnerPart" id="part2"><div class="messageBody isFormattedText"><div class="RMCCIKBX"><p>Hello,<p><p>It'svery often that a default SSH port is changed to a non standard value.<br />In that casenative SSH tunnels in pgAdmin are absolutely useless and <span class="RMCCIKBX short_text" id="RMCCIKBXresult_box" lang="en"><spanclass="RMCCIKBX hps alt-edited">so we have to</span> <span class="RMCCIKBX hps">use old </span></span><spanclass="RMCCIKBX short_text" id="RMCCIKBXresult_box" lang="en"><span class="RMCCIKBX hps">inconvenientmethods for SSH tunnels</span></span>.<p><br />Would it be possible to add support for non standart remoteSSH port?<p><div id="RMCCIKBXeditor_compose_signature"><p>_______________<p>Regards,<p>Alex Grechko.</div></div></div></div>
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 10:06 PM, Alex Grechko <alex.grechko@rambler.ru> wrote: > Hello, > > It's very often that a default SSH port is changed to a non standard value. > In that case native SSH tunnels in pgAdmin are absolutely useless and so we > have to use old inconvenient methods for SSH tunnels. > > > Would it be possible to add support for non standart remote SSH port? I thought we had that - guess I must have overlooked it when reviewing. Akshay, how much effort would it be to add? I assume not much. This seems like a usability bug. -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 6:38 AM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 10:06 PM, Alex Grechko <alex.grechko@rambler.ru> wrote:I thought we had that - guess I must have overlooked it when
> Hello,
>
> It's very often that a default SSH port is changed to a non standard value.
> In that case native SSH tunnels in pgAdmin are absolutely useless and so we
> have to use old inconvenient methods for SSH tunnels.
>
>
> Would it be possible to add support for non standart remote SSH port?
reviewing. Akshay, how much effort would it be to add? I assume not
much. This seems like a usability bug.
I am working on it. We will take the default SSH port as input from the user in "SSH Tunnel" tab of New Server Registration dialog. It will
take couple of hours to do that.
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Akshay Joshi
Principal Software Engineer

Phone: +91 20-3058-9517
Mobile: +91 976-788-8246
Mobile: +91 976-788-8246
Hi Dave
I have added support for non standard remote SSH port. I have added one control to take input for "Default SSH port" from the user in SSH Tunnel tab, by default it is 22, but user can modify it.Attached is the patch file, can you please review it. If it looks good to you can you please commit it.
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 2:29 PM, Akshay Joshi <akshay.joshi@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 6:38 AM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 10:06 PM, Alex Grechko <alex.grechko@rambler.ru> wrote:I thought we had that - guess I must have overlooked it when
> Hello,
>
> It's very often that a default SSH port is changed to a non standard value.
> In that case native SSH tunnels in pgAdmin are absolutely useless and so we
> have to use old inconvenient methods for SSH tunnels.
>
>
> Would it be possible to add support for non standart remote SSH port?
reviewing. Akshay, how much effort would it be to add? I assume not
much. This seems like a usability bug.I am working on it. We will take the default SSH port as input from the user in "SSH Tunnel" tab of New Server Registration dialog. It willtake couple of hours to do that.
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company--Akshay JoshiPrincipal Software EngineerPhone: +91 20-3058-9517
Mobile: +91 976-788-8246
--
Akshay Joshi
Principal Software Engineer

Phone: +91 20-3058-9517
Mobile: +91 976-788-8246
Mobile: +91 976-788-8246
Hi
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Akshay Joshi <akshay.joshi@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
Hi DaveI have added support for non standard remote SSH port. I have added one control to take input for "Default SSH port" from the user in SSH Tunnel tab, by default it is 22, but user can modify it.
Attached is the patch file, can you please review it. If it looks good to you can you please commit it.
Shouldn't it just be "SSH Port"?
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 2:29 PM, Akshay Joshi <akshay.joshi@enterprisedb.com> wrote:On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 6:38 AM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 10:06 PM, Alex Grechko <alex.grechko@rambler.ru> wrote:I thought we had that - guess I must have overlooked it when
> Hello,
>
> It's very often that a default SSH port is changed to a non standard value.
> In that case native SSH tunnels in pgAdmin are absolutely useless and so we
> have to use old inconvenient methods for SSH tunnels.
>
>
> Would it be possible to add support for non standart remote SSH port?
reviewing. Akshay, how much effort would it be to add? I assume not
much. This seems like a usability bug.I am working on it. We will take the default SSH port as input from the user in "SSH Tunnel" tab of New Server Registration dialog. It willtake couple of hours to do that.
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company--
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 5:24 PM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:
HiOn Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Akshay Joshi <akshay.joshi@enterprisedb.com> wrote:Hi DaveI have added support for non standard remote SSH port. I have added one control to take input for "Default SSH port" from the user in SSH Tunnel tab, by default it is 22, but user can modify it.
Attached is the patch file, can you please review it. If it looks good to you can you please commit it.Shouldn't it just be "SSH Port"?
OR "Remote SSH Port"?
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 2:29 PM, Akshay Joshi <akshay.joshi@enterprisedb.com> wrote:On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 6:38 AM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 10:06 PM, Alex Grechko <alex.grechko@rambler.ru> wrote:I thought we had that - guess I must have overlooked it when
> Hello,
>
> It's very often that a default SSH port is changed to a non standard value.
> In that case native SSH tunnels in pgAdmin are absolutely useless and so we
> have to use old inconvenient methods for SSH tunnels.
>
>
> Would it be possible to add support for non standart remote SSH port?
reviewing. Akshay, how much effort would it be to add? I assume not
much. This seems like a usability bug.I am working on it. We will take the default SSH port as input from the user in "SSH Tunnel" tab of New Server Registration dialog. It willtake couple of hours to do that.
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company--
----
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Akshay Joshi
Principal Software Engineer

Phone: +91 20-3058-9517
Mobile: +91 976-788-8246
Mobile: +91 976-788-8246
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Akshay Joshi <akshay.joshi@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 5:24 PM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:HiOn Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Akshay Joshi <akshay.joshi@enterprisedb.com> wrote:Hi DaveI have added support for non standard remote SSH port. I have added one control to take input for "Default SSH port" from the user in SSH Tunnel tab, by default it is 22, but user can modify it.
Attached is the patch file, can you please review it. If it looks good to you can you please commit it.Shouldn't it just be "SSH Port"?OR "Remote SSH Port"?
"Tunnel Port" seems like it would fit in with the existing UI a little better.
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 5:50 PM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Akshay Joshi <akshay.joshi@enterprisedb.com> wrote:On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 5:24 PM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:HiOn Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Akshay Joshi <akshay.joshi@enterprisedb.com> wrote:Hi DaveI have added support for non standard remote SSH port. I have added one control to take input for "Default SSH port" from the user in SSH Tunnel tab, by default it is 22, but user can modify it.
Attached is the patch file, can you please review it. If it looks good to you can you please commit it.Shouldn't it just be "SSH Port"?OR "Remote SSH Port"?"Tunnel Port" seems like it would fit in with the existing UI a little better.
Done. Attached is the new modified patch.
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Akshay Joshi
Principal Software Engineer

Phone: +91 20-3058-9517
Mobile: +91 976-788-8246
Mobile: +91 976-788-8246
Attachment
Thanks - applied with minor tweaks to the layout.
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 1:16 PM, Akshay Joshi <akshay.joshi@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 5:50 PM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Akshay Joshi <akshay.joshi@enterprisedb.com> wrote:On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 5:24 PM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:HiOn Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Akshay Joshi <akshay.joshi@enterprisedb.com> wrote:Hi DaveI have added support for non standard remote SSH port. I have added one control to take input for "Default SSH port" from the user in SSH Tunnel tab, by default it is 22, but user can modify it.
Attached is the patch file, can you please review it. If it looks good to you can you please commit it.Shouldn't it just be "SSH Port"?OR "Remote SSH Port"?"Tunnel Port" seems like it would fit in with the existing UI a little better.Done. Attached is the new modified patch.--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Thanks Dave.
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 4:53 PM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:
Thanks - applied with minor tweaks to the layout.On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 1:16 PM, Akshay Joshi <akshay.joshi@enterprisedb.com> wrote:On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 5:50 PM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Akshay Joshi <akshay.joshi@enterprisedb.com> wrote:On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 5:24 PM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:HiOn Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Akshay Joshi <akshay.joshi@enterprisedb.com> wrote:Hi DaveI have added support for non standard remote SSH port. I have added one control to take input for "Default SSH port" from the user in SSH Tunnel tab, by default it is 22, but user can modify it.
Attached is the patch file, can you please review it. If it looks good to you can you please commit it.Shouldn't it just be "SSH Port"?OR "Remote SSH Port"?"Tunnel Port" seems like it would fit in with the existing UI a little better.Done. Attached is the new modified patch.--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Akshay Joshi
Principal Software Engineer

Phone: +91 20-3058-9517
Mobile: +91 976-788-8246
Mobile: +91 976-788-8246