Thread: what is the maximum number of rows in a table in postgresql 8.1
Ok, finally am changing my question.
Do get quick response from postgresql what is the maximum number of records i can have in a table in postgresql 8.1 ???
Do get quick response from postgresql what is the maximum number of records i can have in a table in postgresql 8.1 ???
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 4:42 AM, sathiya psql <sathiya.psql@gmail.com> wrote: > Ok, finally am changing my question. > Do get quick response from postgresql what is the maximum number of records > i can have in a table in postgresql 8.1 ??? I am not sure I understand your question. maybe this link answers your question: http://www.postgresql.org/about/ Regards, Richard Broersma Jr.
I am not sure I understand your question. maybe this link answers
your question:
http://www.postgresql.org/about/
this i know.....
this is the documentation limitations...
i need what will be the maximum number of rows to have good performance in postgres 8.1
this is the documentation limitations...
i need what will be the maximum number of rows to have good performance in postgres 8.1
Sathiya
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 5:12 AM, sathiya psql <sathiya.psql@gmail.com> wrote: > i need what will be the maximum number of rows to have good performance in > postgres 8.1 This article give you the options that you have with postgresql. http://www.commandprompt.com/blogs/joshua_drake/2007/08/how_many_rows_do_i_have_anyway/ Regards, Richard Broersma Jr.
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 05:42:46PM +0530, sathiya psql wrote: > > I am not sure I understand your question. maybe this link answers > > your question: > > http://www.postgresql.org/about/ > > > this i know..... > > this is the documentation limitations... > > i need what will be the maximum number of rows *to have good performance* in > postgres 8.1 That depends on your database schema and the queries you're running. We've got PostgreSQL 8.2 databases with over 200 million rows in a table and it's performing well. And there are possibly larger databases around. Bye, Tino. -- www.craniosacralzentrum.de www.spiritualdesign-chemnitz.de www.forteego.de Tino Schwarze * Lortzingstraße 21 * 09119 Chemnitz
On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 17:42 +0530, sathiya psql wrote: > > > I am not sure I understand your question. maybe this link > answers > your question: > http://www.postgresql.org/about/ > this i know..... > > this is the documentation limitations... > > i need what will be the maximum number of rows to have good > performance in postgres 8.1 You want a simple answer to a very difficult question and regrettably it isn't that simple or that quick. Some of the considerations you would need to think about would be: * What workloads are you running? * What hardware will it run on? * What performance is required? ... -- Simon Riggs 2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL UK 2008 Conference: http://www.postgresql.org.uk
Re: what is the maximum number of rows in a table in postgresql 8.1
From
hubert depesz lubaczewski
Date:
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 05:42:46PM +0530, sathiya psql wrote: > i need what will be the maximum number of rows *to have good performance* in > postgres 8.1 any. just accept the fact that count(*) is *always* slow. use triggers to store counts if you are using them all of the time. also, i have two simple requests: 1. try to write to 1 mailing list. and not send the same question to all lists you can find. 2. please try to avoid using workds like "lakh" or "crore" in your mails. i assume they mean something in your country of origin, but as far as i know this is not english. regards, depesz -- quicksil1er: "postgres is excellent, but like any DB it requires a highly paid DBA. here's my CV!" :) http://www.depesz.com/ - blog dla ciebie (i moje CV)