Thread: BUG #11872: row height is not quite tall eneough
The following bug has been logged on the website: Bug reference: 11872 Logged by: pgadmin result grid Email address: drickner@indy.rr.com PostgreSQL version: 9.4beta2 Operating system: Windows 7 x64 Description: to display '_' (underscore) characters in fields. They appear as spaces unless you change the row height by about a pixel or 2.
Le 5 nov. 2014 00:12, <drickner@indy.rr.com> a =C3=A9crit : > > The following bug has been logged on the website: > > Bug reference: 11872 > Logged by: pgadmin result grid > Email address: drickner@indy.rr.com > PostgreSQL version: 9.4beta2 > Operating system: Windows 7 x64 > Description: > > to display '_' (underscore) characters in fields. They appear as spaces > unless you change the row height by about a pixel or 2. > I guess this is more a PgAdmin big report. You should send those to the PgAdmin support list, not here.
Guillaume Lelarge wrote: > I guess this is more a PgAdmin [bug] report. You should send those to the > PgAdmin support list, not here. I expect many people go to the postgresql.org website to report a bug in the "family". I don't see why the website cannot be a little more helpful with that. Hadn't we already agreed that we were going to modify the bug report web form and add pgAdmin, ODBC, JDBC etc as a list of "products" for which to report the bug? I hear there's people with web skills willing to help. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Guillaume Lelarge wrote: > >> I guess this is more a PgAdmin [bug] report. You should send those to the >> PgAdmin support list, not here. > > I expect many people go to the postgresql.org website to report a bug in > the "family". I don't see why the website cannot be a little more > helpful with that. Hadn't we already agreed that we were going to > modify the bug report web form and add pgAdmin, ODBC, JDBC etc as a list > of "products" for which to report the bug? I hear there's people with > web skills willing to help. I'm pretty sure the agreement was to make it clear on the form, which we did. It's even written in bold that you should specifically not use that form for pgadmin, odbc and jdbc. With a link to the list of mailinglists for them. We could make direct links for some projects, but where do we draw the line for which projects get included in that? Just the ones that people report incorrectly? We can't really use the form itself, because it requires you to pick pg version for example - whereas pgadmin would be interested in which version of pgadmin... -- Magnus HaganderMe: http://www.hagander.net/Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/