Thread: pgsql: Fixed some memory leaks in ECPG.
Fixed some memory leaks in ECPG. Patch by Michael Paquier Branch ------ master Details ------- http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/96ad72d1c00fa6526eb4d5e9c2a747b44752b4ee Modified Files -------------- src/interfaces/ecpg/preproc/descriptor.c | 12 +++++++++--- src/interfaces/ecpg/preproc/pgc.l | 4 +++- src/interfaces/ecpg/preproc/variable.c | 4 +++- 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 10:05 PM, Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org> wrote: > Fixed some memory leaks in ECPG. > > Patch by Michael Paquier Shouldn't this commit be cherry-picked on back-branches? -- Michael
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 12:21:49PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > Shouldn't this commit be cherry-picked on back-branches? Yes and it will, I'm currently working on it. I somehow got into the habbit of doing the cherry-picks the day after to run the patch through the buildfarm first. Wasn't really needed for these two, maybe I should change my habbits again. Michael -- Michael Meskes Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org) Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org Jabber: michael.meskes at gmail dot com VfL Borussia! Força Barça! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 6:06 PM, Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org> wrote: > On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 12:21:49PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: >> Shouldn't this commit be cherry-picked on back-branches? > > Yes and it will, I'm currently working on it. I somehow got into the habbit > of doing the cherry-picks the day after to run the patch through the > buildfarm first. Wasn't really needed for these two, maybe I should change > my habbits again. Well, that's your style. I think that you should keep it if you think that this is the right way of doing for such patches ;) -- Michael