Thread: Array functions not mentioned in Index
None of the array functions (http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/interactive/functions-array.html) are mentioned in the documentation index. Is that intentional? I thought it would be 'handy' to have those functions referenced in index. Mike
Mario Splivalo wrote: > None of the array functions > (http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/interactive/functions-array.html) > are mentioned in the documentation index. Is that intentional? > I thought it would be 'handy' to have those functions referenced in index. Agreed -- please submit a patch. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Mario Splivalo wrote: >> None of the array functions >> (http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/interactive/functions-array.html) >> are mentioned in the documentation index. Is that intentional? >> I thought it would be 'handy' to have those functions referenced in index. > > Agreed -- please submit a patch. > Sure thing. It will take some time to get along with Docbook, indexing and everything. Mike
Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Mario Splivalo wrote: >> None of the array functions >> (http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/interactive/functions-array.html) >> are mentioned in the documentation index. Is that intentional? >> I thought it would be 'handy' to have those functions referenced in index. > > Agreed -- please submit a patch. Hope this is ok. How can I submit patch for 8.3 documentation? Mario ? func.sgml.patch Index: doc/src/sgml/func.sgml =================================================================== RCS file: /projects/cvsroot/pgsql/doc/src/sgml/func.sgml,v retrieving revision 1.473 diff -c -r1.473 func.sgml *** doc/src/sgml/func.sgml 23 Mar 2009 21:00:38 -0000 1.473 --- doc/src/sgml/func.sgml 1 Apr 2009 01:48:14 -0000 *************** *** 9338,9343 **** --- 9338,9380 ---- for more discussion and examples of the use of these functions. </para> + <indexterm> + <primary>array_append</primary> + </indexterm> + <indexterm> + <primary>array_cat</primary> + </indexterm> + <indexterm> + <primary>array_ndims</primary> + </indexterm> + <indexterm> + <primary>array_dims</primary> + </indexterm> + <indexterm> + <primary>array_fill</primary> + </indexterm> + <indexterm> + <primary>array_length</primary> + </indexterm> + <indexterm> + <primary>array_lower</primary> + </indexterm> + <indexterm> + <primary>array_prepend</primary> + </indexterm> + <indexterm> + <primary>array_to_string</primary> + </indexterm> + <indexterm> + <primary>array_upper</primary> + </indexterm> + <indexterm> + <primary>string_to_array</primary> + </indexterm> + <indexterm> + <primary>cardinality</primary> + </indexterm> + <table id="array-functions-table"> <title>Array Functions</title> <tgroup cols="5">
Mario Splivalo <mario.splivalo@megafon.hr> writes:
> Hope this is ok. How can I submit patch for 8.3 documentation?
I think you just did. Applied, thanks.
regards, tom lane
PS: why'd you omit unnest()?
Tom Lane wrote:
> Mario Splivalo <mario.splivalo@megafon.hr> writes:
>> Hope this is ok. How can I submit patch for 8.3 documentation?
>
> I think you just did. Applied, thanks.
I pulled the source from CVS HEAD branch, I see that is 8.4
documentation (for instance, 'cardinality' function is nonexistant for 8.3).
> PS: why'd you omit unnest()?
I overlooked it, I guess. Sorry.
Mike
Mario Splivalo wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > > Mario Splivalo <mario.splivalo@megafon.hr> writes: > >> Hope this is ok. How can I submit patch for 8.3 documentation? > > > > I think you just did. Applied, thanks. > > I pulled the source from CVS HEAD branch, I see that is 8.4 > documentation (for instance, 'cardinality' function is nonexistant for 8.3). > > > PS: why'd you omit unnest()? > > I overlooked it, I guess. Sorry. Did unnest() get added properly too? -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> Did unnest() get added properly too?
Yes, I included it in the patch.
regards, tom lane