Thread: PC color icon data?
Howdy:
Running PostgreSQL 7.2.1 on RedHat Linux 7.2.
I know this will sound stupid, but can someone
tell me what this means: 'PC color icon data' ?
Background: I copy a table out to a .txt file
by doing this:
[snip]
psql -U postgres -d bcn -c "\\copy measures to
'/tmp/fiveyears.txt' using delimiters '\|'"
[/snip]
and when I use it elsewhere or if I type 'file' to
make sure it's a text file, I get this:
[snip message]
[admin@localserver test]$ file fiveyears.txt
fiveyears.txt: PC color icon data
[/snip message]
I am looking at the owner of this data and I see
a pattern, but I've never heard of something like
this. So, my *real* question should be:
How does PostgreSQL figure out what the difference
when copying a file? I have things like "ASCII text",
"ASCII C++ program text", "Netpbm PBM image text",
"Non-ISO extended-ASCII English text, with LF,
NEL line terminators", etc ... and can I convert
them to just ASCII?
Thanks!
-X
> How does PostgreSQL figure out what the difference > when copying a file? It doesn't. 'file' does. The data you export just happens to look like the formats 'file' thinks it is in. And maybe it is. Have you tried actually *looking* at the data in question ? Karsten -- GPG key ID E4071346 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346
--yes, i've looked at it. it appears fine.
--i just can't do a lot with it because
--i am getting errors like 'trailing null missing'
--and the like.
--i'm going to try to use MS Access or something to
--move the data around. even when i 'cp' / 'cat' /
--'cut and paste' the data, 'file' gives me the same
--message.
--what i don't get (and this could be a Unix question)
--is why there are differences anyway. it would
--seem to me that if the data is being copied
--out the same way, from the same location, the
--results should be the same.
--i would't think that 'file' would see different
--formats when the source should be the same.
-X
>>
>>> How does PostgreSQL figure out what the difference
>>> when copying a file?
>>It doesn't. 'file' does. The data you export just happens to
>>look like the formats 'file' thinks it is in. And maybe it is.
>>Have you tried actually *looking* at the data in question ?
>>
>>Karsten
>>