Thread: Re: Important Info on comp.databases.postgresql.general
Re: Important Info on comp.databases.postgresql.general
From
joseph_daniel_zukiger@yahoo.com (Joseph Daniel Zukiger)
Date:
pvaurio@solaris.polarhome.com wrote in message news:<1100045294.247165.11750@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>... > The lists are not bogus and your suggestion is not acceptable. Many of > the list subscribers have no connection to Usenet. They will be mailed > the ballots, regardless of what you or anyone else say. They are the > people who will be directly affected by this. > > Mr. Pauli Vaurio > ... Pauli -- "Bogus" is being used here in a technical sense. It is not a judgement of value. The groups in question have not conformed to certain rules/customs. In that sense, their names are "bogus" -- not official, conforming use of the namespaces the usenet organization has reserved. The fact that these groups apparently have the most right to the names in question is a big point in their favor, but the group maintainer did not go through the customary processes in reserving the names and requesting listing. So they are not official, thus they are "bogus". It looks like I'm may have to finally subscribe through my isp and learn how to configure a newsreader in order to vote in favor, instead of posting through google all the time. That should speed my access to usenet up quite a bit. Oh, well. JouDanZuki
Joseph Daniel Zukiger wrote: > pvaurio@solaris.polarhome.com wrote in message > news:<1100045294.247165.11750@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>... >> The lists are not bogus and your suggestion is not acceptable. Many of >> the list subscribers have no connection to Usenet. They will be mailed >> the ballots, regardless of what you or anyone else say. They are the >> people who will be directly affected by this. >> >> Mr. Pauli Vaurio >> ... > > Pauli -- > > "Bogus" is being used here in a technical sense. It is not a judgement > of value. > > The groups in question have not conformed to certain rules/customs. In > that sense, their names are "bogus" -- not official, conforming use of > the namespaces the usenet organization has reserved. > > The fact that these groups apparently have the most right to the names > in question is a big point in their favor, but the group maintainer > did not go through the customary processes in reserving the names and > requesting listing. So they are not official, thus they are "bogus". > > It looks like I'm may have to finally subscribe through my isp and > learn how to configure a newsreader in order to vote in favor, instead > of posting through google all the time. That should speed my access to > usenet up quite a bit. Oh, well. > > JouDanZuki Joe, your access to ng's will speed up *dramatically* when you go through a news server. The one Mike Cox recommended in his reply is very reliable. -- Kenneth Downs Use first initial plus last name at last name plus literal "fam.net" to email me