Thread: vacuuming - doubt
Hi,
Another theory question -
PostgreSQL documentation says that - "There are two variants of VACUUM: standard VACUUM and VACUUM FULL. VACUUM FULL can reclaim more disk space "
select pg_total_relation_size('myt');;
pg_total_relation_size
------------------------
65536
(1 row)
accounts=> vacuum myt;
VACUUM
accounts=> select pg_total_relation_size('myt');;
pg_total_relation_size
------------------------
16384
(1 row)
accounts=> vacuum full myt;
VACUUM
accounts=> select pg_total_relation_size('myt');;
pg_total_relation_size
------------------------
0
(1 row)
Regards,
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 1:08 AM, Jayadevan M <maymala.jayadevan@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > Another theory question - > PostgreSQL documentation says that - > "There are two variants of VACUUM: standard VACUUM and VACUUM FULL. VACUUM > FULL can reclaim more disk space " > I created a table, inserted 1000 records and deleted them. The size after a > vacuum and a vacuum full are given - > select pg_total_relation_size('myt');; > pg_total_relation_size > ------------------------ > 65536 > (1 row) > > accounts=> vacuum myt; > VACUUM > > accounts=> select pg_total_relation_size('myt');; > pg_total_relation_size > ------------------------ > 16384 > (1 row) > > accounts=> vacuum full myt; > VACUUM > accounts=> select pg_total_relation_size('myt');; > pg_total_relation_size > ------------------------ > 0 > (1 row) > > So what was the 65536 bytes left behind after standard vacuum? 30 second vacuum lesson: regular vacuum marks empty space for re-use, and reclaims the empty space at the end of a relation. So if the empty space is in the middle etc it can't be reclaimed just reused. vacuum full compacts a relation reclaiming all the empty space. It requires an exclusive lock and is bad for production systems in general because of this. So the purpose of REGULAR vacuum is not to reclaim space from the tables but to make it available for reuse later. The purpose of vacuum FULL is to reclaim all wasted space at the expense of an exclusive lock and db performance while it's happening. So, since regular vacuum isn't designed to reclaim everything you shouldn't be surprised that it did not, in fact, reclaim everything. Try your experiment on larger datasets with more random deletions etc to see the difference between regular and full vacuum.
Scott Marlowe-2 wrote > 30 second vacuum lesson: Thank you. -- View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/vacuuming-doubt-tp5782828p5783057.html Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.