Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Thread: Speed boost + Others

Speed boost + Others

From
PostgreSQL
Date:
Hello everybody,

Great job for 6.3! On my Linux box a nightmare interogation got down from
15 seconds to 3 seconds.

Bad surprize: The parser does not accept anymore field names like "valid"
and "no". Will this be the normal behaviour from now on or just a
misunderstanding?

Costin Oproiu

Re: [HACKERS] Speed boost + Others

From
Bruce Momjian
Date:
>
> Hello everybody,
>
> Great job for 6.3! On my Linux box a nightmare interogation got down from
> 15 seconds to 3 seconds.
>
> Bad surprize: The parser does not accept anymore field names like "valid"
> and "no". Will this be the normal behaviour from now on or just a
> misunderstanding?
>
> Costin Oproiu

What was the old version, 6.2.1?

--
Bruce Momjian
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us

Re: [HACKERS] Speed boost + Others

From
The Hermit Hacker
Date:
On Tue, 3 Feb 1998, PostgreSQL wrote:

> Hello everybody,
>
> Great job for 6.3! On my Linux box a nightmare interogation got down from
> 15 seconds to 3 seconds.
>
> Bad surprize: The parser does not accept anymore field names like "valid"
> and "no". Will this be the normal behaviour from now on or just a
> misunderstanding?

    We've tighted down on use of 'reserved words' for field
names...this is now 'normal behavior'

Marc G. Fournier
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy@hub.org           secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org

Re: [HACKERS] Speed boost + Others

From
PostgreSQL
Date:

On Mon, 2 Feb 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> >
> > Hello everybody,
> >
> > Great job for 6.3! On my Linux box a nightmare interogation got down from
> > 15 seconds to 3 seconds.
> >
> > Bad surprize: The parser does not accept anymore field names like "valid"
> > and "no". Will this be the normal behaviour from now on or just a
> > misunderstanding?
> >
> > Costin Oproiu
>
> What was the old version, 6.2.1?

    yep

>
> --
> Bruce Momjian
> maillist@candle.pha.pa.us
>