Thread: 6.4.3? and version numbers
Hi all First, what ever came of the talk of a 6.4.3 and supporting a release back? A client of mine has 6.3 installed, and I need to know if I should advise them to go to 6.4.2? or if 6.4.3 is about to come out? or how close is 6.5? (I want to use some of the features not in 6.3.x) ------------------------------------- On another matter, version numbers. What would every one think of numbers where to 2nd number being odd or even denotes development or stable respectively? like with the Linux kernel. Now would be a great time to move to it, as it has already been discused to use 6.4.x as the "stable" version, the current development version is 6.5, so when it is ready it could be released as 6.6.0 Tanks and have a great day Terry Mackintosh <terry@terrym.com> http://www.terrym.com sysadmin/owner I'm excited about life! How about YOU!? Professional Web Hosting and site design to include programming Proudly powered by R H Linux 4.2, Apache 1.3.x, PHP 3.x, PostgreSQL 6.x ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Only if you know where you're going can you get there.
On Wed, 17 Feb 1999, Terry Mackintosh wrote:
> Hi all
>
> First, what ever came of the talk of a 6.4.3 and supporting a release
> back?
>
> A client of mine has 6.3 installed, and I need to know if I should advise
> them to go to 6.4.2? or if 6.4.3 is about to come out? or how close is
> 6.5? (I want to use some of the features not in 6.3.x)
>
> -------------------------------------
>
> On another matter, version numbers. What would every one think of numbers
> where to 2nd number being odd or even denotes development or stable
> respectively? like with the Linux kernel.
Not in your wildest dreams...that has been asked over and over again ove
the past few years, and I veto it each and every time...we follow the *BSD
development model, not the Linux one...
Marc G. Fournier
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org
On Wed, 17 Feb 1999, The Hermit Hacker wrote: > On Wed, 17 Feb 1999, Terry Mackintosh wrote: > > > Hi all > > > > First, what ever came of the talk of a 6.4.3 and supporting a release > > back? > > > > A client of mine has 6.3 installed, and I need to know if I should advise > > them to go to 6.4.2? or if 6.4.3 is about to come out? or how close is > > 6.5? (I want to use some of the features not in 6.3.x) > > > > ------------------------------------- > > > > On another matter, version numbers. What would every one think of numbers > > where to 2nd number being odd or even denotes development or stable > > respectively? like with the Linux kernel. > > Not in your wildest dreams...that has been asked over and over again ove > the past few years, and I veto it each and every time...we follow the *BSD > development model, not the Linux one... Even though I'm in the Linux camp, I agree with Marc. I'd think it would cause a lot of confusion to us developers trying to keep track of more than one source tree. Even my own development projects follow the PostgreSQL (aka BSD) model, as to my mind it's the easiest to maintain. Peter -- Peter T Mount peter@retep.org.uk Main Homepage: http://www.retep.org.uk PostgreSQL JDBC Faq: http://www.retep.org.uk/postgresJava PDF Generator: http://www.retep.org.uk/pdf
Thus spake The Hermit Hacker
> > On another matter, version numbers. What would every one think of numbers
> > where to 2nd number being odd or even denotes development or stable
> > respectively? like with the Linux kernel.
>
> Not in your wildest dreams...that has been asked over and over again ove
> the past few years, and I veto it each and every time...we follow the *BSD
> development model, not the Linux one...
Besides, we never have anything but stable releases anyway, right? :-)
--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy@{druid|vex}.net> | Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on
+1 416 424 2871 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner.