> > As I said in another posting a user does not need to exist
> > for each schema. The dba can create objects under any
> > schema name.
> >
>
> Sorry for my poor understanding.
> What I meant was that SQL92 allows the following.
>
> schema owner
> ---------------------------
> schema1 user1
> schema2 user1
> schema3 user2
> schema4 user3
> schema5 user3
> schema6 user3
>
> Is my understaning same as yours ?
Yes, this is how I read the spec 99. Also:schema1 user1schema1 user2
I doubt that this really buys any features that a simple grant cannot give.
I mean, if a user creates an object with a schema name that is different
from his user name we could simply grant him all rights on this object
(if he isn't dba).
Andreas
