Thread: AW: AW: AW: WAL does not recover gracefully from out-of -dis k-sp ace
AW: AW: AW: WAL does not recover gracefully from out-of -dis k-sp ace
From
Zeugswetter Andreas SB
Date:
> > > Of course we would need to buffer >= 1 xlog page before write (or commit) > > > to gain the full advantage. > > > > > prewrite 0 + write and fsync: 60.4 sec > > > sparse file + write with O_SYNC: 37.5 sec > > > no prewrite + write with O_SYNC: 36.8 sec > > > prewrite 0 + write with O_SYNC: 24.0 sec > > The reason I'm inclined to question this is that what we want is not an > > fsync per write but an fsync per transaction, and we can't easily buffer > > all of a transaction's XLOG writes... > > Yes, that is something to consider, but it would probably be sufficient to buffer > 1-3 optimal IO blocks (32-256k here). > I assumed that with a few busy clients the fsyncs would come close to > one xlog page, but that is probably too few. I get best performance with eighter: prewrite + 16k write with O_SYNC: 15.5 sec prewrite + 32k write with O_SYNC: 11.5 sec no prewite + 256k write with O_SYNC: 5.4 sec But this 256k per tx would probably be very unrealistic, thus best overall performance would probably be achieved with a 32k (or tuneable) xlog buffer O_SYNC and prewrite. Maybe a good thing for 7.1.1 :-) Andreas