Thread: reminder for those working on docs
Since 7.4 is getting real close and docs are going to be going through their final once-overs. Please remember to have a look at the DocNote comments that have been submitted. Once 7.4 is released the current notes will be gone. http://www.postgresql.org/idocs/checknotes.php The above url will show the notes and what they're in relation to with a link to that particular piece of documentation. Vince. -- ========================================================================== Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH email: vev@michvhf.com http://www.pop4.net 56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/mo at Pop4 Networking http://www.camping-usa.com http://www.cloudninegifts.com http://www.meanstreamradio.com http://www.unknown-artists.com ==========================================================================
Vince Vielhaber <vev@michvhf.com> writes: > Since 7.3 is getting real close and docs are going to be going through > their final once-overs. Please remember to have a look at the DocNote > comments that have been submitted. Once 7.3 is released the current > notes will be gone. > http://www.postgresql.org/idocs/checknotes.php > The above url will show the notes and what they're in relation to with > a link to that particular piece of documentation. I've gone through this, and found only a couple of things that seemed worth migrating into the 7.3 docs. Perhaps I just have a low tolerance for silliness tonight, but it seemed like the average quality of the comments was a lot lower than in previous release cycles :-( regards, tom lane
Tom Lane wrote: > Vince Vielhaber <vev@michvhf.com> writes: > > Since 7.3 is getting real close and docs are going to be going through > > their final once-overs. Please remember to have a look at the DocNote > > comments that have been submitted. Once 7.3 is released the current > > notes will be gone. > > http://www.postgresql.org/idocs/checknotes.php > > The above url will show the notes and what they're in relation to with > > a link to that particular piece of documentation. > > I've gone through this, and found only a couple of things that seemed > worth migrating into the 7.3 docs. Perhaps I just have a low tolerance > for silliness tonight, but it seemed like the average quality of the > comments was a lot lower than in previous release cycles :-( It is possible our docs are getting clearer and there is less fiddling to do. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> I've gone through this, and found only a couple of things that seemed >> worth migrating into the 7.3 docs. Perhaps I just have a low tolerance >> for silliness tonight, but it seemed like the average quality of the >> comments was a lot lower than in previous release cycles :-( > It is possible our docs are getting clearer and there is less fiddling > to do. Or I'm just being a jerk tonight. Anyone else care to make a pass through the comments? It seemed like an awful lot of the stuff that was credible at all was "point <foo> should be mentioned over here in part <bar>", which I mostly didn't agree with, but maybe someone else would see it differently. regards, tom lane