Thread: Re: [PATCHES] Win32 CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() performance

> > > OK, running the latest patch.  Observations:
> > > ...
> > > I ran tests for about an hour, randomly killing/canceling
> backends
> > > without any problems.
> >
> > Are we all comfortable that
> > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-10/msg01009.php
> > is OK to apply?
>
> Yea. I can vouch for Magnus as well (he said so off list).
> I'd vote with my own servers anyways.

Yup, and I can also vouch fo rmyself ;-) Just didn't get around to it
until now.

Yes, I believe we should be fine with that patch, even though we're late
in beta. It's a huge win, so I htink it's worth the small extra risk it
is.

//Magnus

"Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net> writes:
>>> Are we all comfortable that
>>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-10/msg01009.php
>>> is OK to apply?
>> 
>> Yea. I can vouch for Magnus as well (he said so off list).  
>> I'd vote with my own servers anyways.

> Yup, and I can also vouch fo rmyself ;-) Just didn't get around to it
> until now.

> Yes, I believe we should be fine with that patch, even though we're late
> in beta. It's a huge win, so I htink it's worth the small extra risk it
> is.

OK, patch committed.  Please recheck that CVS tip is OK.
        regards, tom lane