I'm proposing to make the attached change to some LDAP error messages.
Aside from fixing a pluralization issue, I want to separate fact (search
resulted in != 1 result) from interpretation (LDAP user does not exist,
and that's a problem).
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 2:57 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
> I'm proposing to make the attached change to some LDAP error messages.
> Aside from fixing a pluralization issue, I want to separate fact (search
> resulted in != 1 result) from interpretation (LDAP user does not exist,
> and that's a problem).
Looks good to me, +1.
-- Magnus HaganderMe: http://www.hagander.net/Work:http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
Есть вопросы? Напишите нам!
Соглашаюсь с условиями обработки персональных данных
✖
By continuing to browse this website, you agree to the use of cookies. Go to Privacy Policy.