Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> So clearly there is an overflow somewhere in the calculation of
> effective_cache_size, most likely from the fact that it's now dynamically
> calculated.
Yeah. Fixed.
regards, tom lane
Есть вопросы? Напишите нам!
Соглашаюсь с условиями обработки персональных данных
✖
By continuing to browse this website, you agree to the use of cookies. Go to Privacy Policy.