Thread: ODBC Driver performance comparison
Hello all!
I do some test with ODBC driver for PosgreSql, TimesTen & MySQL. I compare performance on very simple request. Database always located on same PC as test application. Test PC - Lenovo T500, Cnetos 6.5 64, 8 Gb RAM, SSD.IMHO problems related to protocol used. I can't use SHM connection to server or even UNIX socket.
perftool report - http://freepcrf.com/files/db_test_pq.pdf
chart 1 (w/o timesten) - http://freepcrf.com/files/drv_comp1.png
chart 2 - http://freepcrf.com/files/drv_comp2.pngchart 1 (w/o timesten) - http://freepcrf.com/files/drv_comp1.png
test source - https://github.com/vvromanov/db_test
--
Vladimir Romanov
I just replied to this on pgsql-odbc mailing list. Since we're talking about client performance, please keep the discussion there. On 09/05/2014 08:54 AM, Vladimir Romanov wrote: > Hello all! > I do some test with ODBC driver for PosgreSql, TimesTen & MySQL. I compare > performance on very simple request. Database always located on same PC as > test application. Test PC - Lenovo T500, Cnetos 6.5 64, 8 Gb RAM, SSD. > I found what PostgreSql ODBC driver is slowest in comparison. > IMHO problems related to protocol used. I can't use SHM connection to > server or even UNIX socket. > > perftool report - http://freepcrf.com/files/db_test_pq.pdf > chart 1 (w/o timesten) - http://freepcrf.com/files/drv_comp1.png > chart 2 - http://freepcrf.com/files/drv_comp2.png > test source - https://github.com/vvromanov/db_test > > - Heikki