Thread: what data type should be returned by sum(float4)
Hello, http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/functions-aggregate.html The documentation says that return type of sum(expression) is... bigint for smallint or int arguments, numeric for bigintarguments, double precision for floating-point arguments, otherwise the same as the argument data type Does it expect sum(float4) returns float8, doesn't it? On the other hand, catalog definition seems to me it returns float4. postgres=# select * from pg_aggregate where aggfnoid in (2110, 2111); aggfnoid | aggkind | aggnumdirectargs | aggtransfn| aggfinalfn | aggmtra nsfn | aggminvtransfn | aggmfinalfn | aggfinalextra | aggmfinalextra | aggsortop| aggtranstype | aggtransspace | aggmtranstype| aggmtransspace | agginitval | aggminitval ----------------+---------+------------------+------------+------------+-------- -----+----------------+-------------+---------------+----------------+---------- -+--------------+---------------+---------------+----------------+------------+- ------------pg_catalog.sum | n | 0 | float4pl | - | - | - | - |f | f | 0| 700 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |pg_catalog.sum| n | 0 | float8pl | - | - | - | - | f | f | 0| 701 | 0 | 0 | 0 | | (2 rows) Which one shall be fixed? Thanks, -- NEC OSS Promotion Center / PG-Strom Project KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>
Kouhei Kaigai <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com> writes: > The documentation says that return type of sum(expression) is... > bigint for smallint or int arguments, numeric for bigint arguments, > double precision for floating-point arguments, otherwise the same > as the argument data type > Does it expect sum(float4) returns float8, doesn't it? Good catch! [ digs in commit history... ] It looks like the claim that sum(float4) produces float8 was introduced in my commit d06ebdb8d3425185d7e641d15e45908658a0177d of 2000-07-17; but it seems to have been an outright error, because sum(float4) was a separate aggregate long before that. Possibly a copy-and-paste mistake from some other aggregate? I sure don't remember. regards, tom lane