Thread: strange test in psql:startup.c
Hi
if (options.single_txn && options.action != ACT_FILE && options.action == ACT_NOTHING)
{
fprintf(stderr, _("%s: -1 can only be used in non-interactive mode\n"), pset.progname);
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
if (options.single_txn && options.action != ACT_FILE && options.action == ACT_NOTHING)
{
fprintf(stderr, _("%s: -1 can only be used in non-interactive mode\n"), pset.progname);
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
the expression should be probably only?
options.single_txn && options.action == ACT_NOTHING)
options.single_txn && options.action == ACT_NOTHING)
Regards
Pavel
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 8:18 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote: > if (options.single_txn && options.action != ACT_FILE && > options.action == ACT_NOTHING) > { > fprintf(stderr, _("%s: -1 can only be used in > non-interactive mode\n"), pset.progname); > exit(EXIT_FAILURE); > } > > the expression should be probably only? > > options.single_txn && options.action == ACT_NOTHING) It seems this was changed by this commit: commit c3c86ae2aff67676a49ec84240f1d6a482f359cb Author: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> Date: Mon Jun 17 21:53:33 2013 -0400 psql: Re-allow -1 together with -c or -l I guess the idea was that we wanted to allow -1 with -c or -l even though it will have no effect in that case. So your suggested change looks right to me. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company