Thread: array of domain types
I wonder why domain types can not be used for specification of array element: create domain objref as bigint; create table foo(x objref[]); ERROR: type "objref[]" does not exist create table foo(x bigint[]); CREATE TABLE Is there some principle problem here or it is just not implemented? -- Konstantin Knizhnik Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com The Russian Postgres Company
On 1 June 2016 at 14:20, Konstantin Knizhnik <k.knizhnik@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
I wonder why domain types can not be used for specification of array element:
create domain objref as bigint;
create table foo(x objref[]);
ERROR: type "objref[]" does not exist
create table foo(x bigint[]);
CREATE TABLE
Is there some principle problem here or it is just not implemented?
It's not implemented, but patches welcome.
Thom
On Jun 1, 2016, at 4:37 PM, Thom Brown wrote:
On 1 June 2016 at 14:20, Konstantin Knizhnik <k.knizhnik@postgrespro.ru> wrote:I wonder why domain types can not be used for specification of array element:
create domain objref as bigint;
create table foo(x objref[]);
ERROR: type "objref[]" does not exist
create table foo(x bigint[]);
CREATE TABLE
Is there some principle problem here or it is just not implemented?It's not implemented, but patches welcome.
Thom
The patch is trivial: just use typbasetype in get_array_type if typtype is TYPTYPE_DOMAIN:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/cache/lsyscache.c b/src/backend/utils/cache/lsyscache.c
index cb26d79..ecfbb20 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/cache/lsyscache.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/cache/lsyscache.c
@@ -2486,7 +2486,18 @@ get_array_type(Oid typid)
if (HeapTupleIsValid(tp))
{
result = ((Form_pg_type) GETSTRUCT(tp))->typarray;
- ReleaseSysCache(tp);
+ if (result == InvalidOid && ((Form_pg_type) GETSTRUCT(tp))->typtype == TYPTYPE_DOMAIN) {
+ typid = ((Form_pg_type) GETSTRUCT(tp))->typbasetype;
+ ReleaseSysCache(tp);
+ tp = SearchSysCache1(TYPEOID, ObjectIdGetDatum(typid));
+ if (HeapTupleIsValid(tp))
+ {
+ result = ((Form_pg_type) GETSTRUCT(tp))->typarray;
+ ReleaseSysCache(tp);
+ }
+ } else {
+ ReleaseSysCache(tp);
+ }
}
return result;
}
Any problems with it?
On 2 June 2016 at 10:13, konstantin knizhnik <k.knizhnik@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
On Jun 1, 2016, at 4:37 PM, Thom Brown wrote:On 1 June 2016 at 14:20, Konstantin Knizhnik <k.knizhnik@postgrespro.ru> wrote:I wonder why domain types can not be used for specification of array element:
create domain objref as bigint;
create table foo(x objref[]);
ERROR: type "objref[]" does not exist
create table foo(x bigint[]);
CREATE TABLE
Is there some principle problem here or it is just not implemented?It's not implemented, but patches welcome.
ThomThe patch is trivial: just use typbasetype in get_array_type if typtype is TYPTYPE_DOMAIN:diff --git a/src/backend/utils/cache/lsyscache.c b/src/backend/utils/cache/lsyscache.cindex cb26d79..ecfbb20 100644--- a/src/backend/utils/cache/lsyscache.c+++ b/src/backend/utils/cache/lsyscache.c@@ -2486,7 +2486,18 @@ get_array_type(Oid typid)if (HeapTupleIsValid(tp)){result = ((Form_pg_type) GETSTRUCT(tp))->typarray;- ReleaseSysCache(tp);+ if (result == InvalidOid && ((Form_pg_type) GETSTRUCT(tp))->typtype == TYPTYPE_DOMAIN) {+ typid = ((Form_pg_type) GETSTRUCT(tp))->typbasetype;+ ReleaseSysCache(tp);+ tp = SearchSysCache1(TYPEOID, ObjectIdGetDatum(typid));+ if (HeapTupleIsValid(tp))+ {+ result = ((Form_pg_type) GETSTRUCT(tp))->typarray;+ ReleaseSysCache(tp);+ }+ } else {+ ReleaseSysCache(tp);+ }}return result;}Any problems with it?
Yes, it doesn't work:
# CREATE DOMAIN teenager AS int CHECK (VALUE BETWEEN 13 AND 19);
# CREATE DOMAIN teenager AS int CHECK (VALUE BETWEEN 13 AND 19);
CREATE DOMAIN
# SELECT 14::teenager;teenager
----------
14
(1 row)
# SELECT 20::teenager;
ERROR: value for domain teenager violates check constraint "teenager_check"
teenager
----------
{14,20}
(1 row)
Thom
On Jun 2, 2016, at 12:29 PM, Thom Brown wrote:
That last one should fail.# SELECT '{14,20}'::teenager[];On 2 June 2016 at 10:13, konstantin knizhnik <k.knizhnik@postgrespro.ru> wrote:Yes, it doesn't work:
# CREATE DOMAIN teenager AS int CHECK (VALUE BETWEEN 13 AND 19);CREATE DOMAIN# SELECT 14::teenager;
teenager
----------
14
(1 row)
# SELECT 20::teenager;
ERROR: value for domain teenager violates check constraint "teenager_check"
teenager
----------
{14,20}
(1 row)
Yes, I see.
This approach was wrong.
Attached please find patch for DefineDomain function.
Thom
Attachment
konstantin knizhnik <k.knizhnik@postgrespro.ru> writes: > Attached please find patch for DefineDomain function. You didn't attach the patch, but in any case, I would be astonished if there is no work required beyond creating the matching array type. The reverse case (domains over arrays) has half a dozen special cases required to make it work smoothly. Probably the considerations on this side are totally different, but it's hard to believe there aren't any. One case that seems likely to be pretty squishy is an array of a domain over an array type. One would wish to be able to do foo[2][4] to extract an element of the contained array. That won't work as-is because the notation will be taken as a multi-dimensional subscript, but I would expect that (foo[2])[4] should work. Does it? Does ruleutils.c always include the necessary parens when reverse-listing such a construct? Is it possible to assign to such a sub-element, and if so, do the domain constraints get checked properly? Domain over an array that is of a domain type might be another fun case. regards, tom lane
On 02.06.2016 17:22, Tom Lane wrote: > konstantin knizhnik <k.knizhnik@postgrespro.ru> writes: >> Attached please find patch for DefineDomain function. > You didn't attach the patch, Sorry, but I did attached the patch - I see the attachment in my mail received from the group. Multidimensional arrays work fine: knizhnik=# SELECT '{{14},{20}}'::teenager[][]; ERROR: value for domain teenager violates check constraint "teenager_check" LINE 1: SELECT '{{14},{20}}'::teenager[][]; ^ knizhnik=# SELECT '{{14},{19}}'::teenager[][]; teenager ------------- {{14},{19}} (1 row) knizhnik=# SELECT ('{{14},{19}}'::teenager[][])[1][1]; teenager ---------- 14 (1 row) Domain of array of domain also works: knizhnik=# create domain teenager_groups as teenager[]; CREATE DOMAIN knizhnik=# SELECT '{{14},{19}}'::teenager_groups; teenager_groups ----------------- {{14},{19}} (1 row) knizhnik=# SELECT '{{14},{20}}'::teenager_groups; ERROR: value for domain teenager violates check constraint "teenager_check" LINE 1: SELECT '{{14},{20}}'::teenager_groups; > but in any case, I would be astonished > if there is no work required beyond creating the matching array type. > The reverse case (domains over arrays) has half a dozen special cases > required to make it work smoothly. Probably the considerations on this > side are totally different, but it's hard to believe there aren't any. > > One case that seems likely to be pretty squishy is an array of a domain > over an array type. One would wish to be able to do foo[2][4] to > extract an element of the contained array. That won't work as-is > because the notation will be taken as a multi-dimensional subscript, > but I would expect that (foo[2])[4] should work. Does it? Does > ruleutils.c always include the necessary parens when reverse-listing > such a construct? Is it possible to assign to such a sub-element, > and if so, do the domain constraints get checked properly? > > Domain over an array that is of a domain type might be another fun > case. > > regards, tom lane -- Konstantin Knizhnik Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com The Russian Postgres Company
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 10:42 AM, Konstantin Knizhnik <k.knizhnik@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
postgres=# CREATE DOMAIN teenager AS int CHECK (VALUE BETWEEN 13 AND 20);
CREATE DOMAIN
postgres=# CREATE DOMAIN teenager_groups AS teenager[];
CREATE DOMAIN
postgres=# CREATE TABLE x (col teenager_groups);
ERROR: cache lookup failed for type 0
On 02.06.2016 17:22, Tom Lane wrote:konstantin knizhnik <k.knizhnik@postgrespro.ru> writes:Attached please find patch for DefineDomain function.You didn't attach the patch,
Sorry, but I did attached the patch - I see the attachment in my mail received from the group.
Multidimensional arrays work fine:
knizhnik=# SELECT '{{14},{20}}'::teenager[][];
ERROR: value for domain teenager violates check constraint "teenager_check"
LINE 1: SELECT '{{14},{20}}'::teenager[][];
^
knizhnik=# SELECT '{{14},{19}}'::teenager[][];
teenager
-------------
{{14},{19}}
(1 row)
knizhnik=# SELECT ('{{14},{19}}'::teenager[][])[1][1];
teenager
----------
14
(1 row)
Domain of array of domain also works:
I applied the domain.patch from above on HEAD, and all I get is cache lookup failures. The type_sanity regression test fails too.
postgres=# CREATE DOMAIN teenager AS int CHECK (VALUE BETWEEN 13 AND 20);
CREATE DOMAIN
postgres=# CREATE DOMAIN teenager_groups AS teenager[];
CREATE DOMAIN
postgres=# CREATE TABLE x (col teenager_groups);
ERROR: cache lookup failed for type 0
Anyway, if that worked for me I would have done this which I expect will succeed when it shouldn't.
INSERT INTO x VALUES (ARRAY[13,14,20]);
ALTER DOMAIN teenager DROP CONSTRAINT teenager_check;
ALTER DOMAIN teenager ADD CHECK (VALUE BETWEEN 13 AND 19);
INSERT INTO x VALUES (ARRAY[13,14,20]);
ALTER DOMAIN teenager DROP CONSTRAINT teenager_check;
ALTER DOMAIN teenager ADD CHECK (VALUE BETWEEN 13 AND 19);
On 03.06.2016 02:02, Rod Taylor wrote:
Sorry, the problem is more difficult than I originally expected:(
Attached patch passes all regression tests and correctly handle conversion of arrays.
But constraints are not checked for table columns. I failed to locate place where this check should be inserted...
Originally I was mostly interested in domains as kind of typedefs: convenient way to assign type to some particular kind of columns,
for example object reference used in ORM.
There are two main goals of using domain here:
1. Be able to easily change representation of object identifier, for example from integer to bigint.
2. Detect all columns containing references (distinguish them from columns containing just normal integers).
I do not see any other mechanism in PostgreSQL which can address this problem (for example user defined type can not help here).
I wonder if it is possible to support arrays of domain which do not have constraints?
Or such partial support is worser than prohibiting arrays of domains at all?
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 10:42 AM, Konstantin Knizhnik <k.knizhnik@postgrespro.ru> wrote:On 02.06.2016 17:22, Tom Lane wrote:konstantin knizhnik <k.knizhnik@postgrespro.ru> writes:Attached please find patch for DefineDomain function.You didn't attach the patch,
Sorry, but I did attached the patch - I see the attachment in my mail received from the group.
Multidimensional arrays work fine:
knizhnik=# SELECT '{{14},{20}}'::teenager[][];
ERROR: value for domain teenager violates check constraint "teenager_check"
LINE 1: SELECT '{{14},{20}}'::teenager[][];
^
knizhnik=# SELECT '{{14},{19}}'::teenager[][];
teenager
-------------
{{14},{19}}
(1 row)
knizhnik=# SELECT ('{{14},{19}}'::teenager[][])[1][1];
teenager
----------
14
(1 row)
Domain of array of domain also works:I applied the domain.patch from above on HEAD, and all I get is cache lookup failures. The type_sanity regression test fails too.
postgres=# CREATE DOMAIN teenager AS int CHECK (VALUE BETWEEN 13 AND 20);
CREATE DOMAIN
postgres=# CREATE DOMAIN teenager_groups AS teenager[];
CREATE DOMAIN
postgres=# CREATE TABLE x (col teenager_groups);
ERROR: cache lookup failed for type 0Anyway, if that worked for me I would have done this which I expect will succeed when it shouldn't.
INSERT INTO x VALUES (ARRAY[13,14,20]);
ALTER DOMAIN teenager DROP CONSTRAINT teenager_check;
ALTER DOMAIN teenager ADD CHECK (VALUE BETWEEN 13 AND 19);
Sorry, the problem is more difficult than I originally expected:(
Attached patch passes all regression tests and correctly handle conversion of arrays.
But constraints are not checked for table columns. I failed to locate place where this check should be inserted...
Originally I was mostly interested in domains as kind of typedefs: convenient way to assign type to some particular kind of columns,
for example object reference used in ORM.
There are two main goals of using domain here:
1. Be able to easily change representation of object identifier, for example from integer to bigint.
2. Detect all columns containing references (distinguish them from columns containing just normal integers).
I do not see any other mechanism in PostgreSQL which can address this problem (for example user defined type can not help here).
I wonder if it is possible to support arrays of domain which do not have constraints?
Or such partial support is worser than prohibiting arrays of domains at all?
-- Konstantin Knizhnik Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com The Russian Postgres Company
Attachment
On 6/3/16 11:50 AM, Konstantin Knizhnik wrote: > Originally I was mostly interested in domains as kind of typedefs: > convenient way to assign type to some particular kind of columns, > for example object reference used in ORM. > There are two main goals of using domain here: > 1. Be able to easily change representation of object identifier, for > example from integer to bigint. > 2. Detect all columns containing references (distinguish them from > columns containing just normal integers). > I do not see any other mechanism in PostgreSQL which can address this > problem (for example user defined type can not help here). > > I wonder if it is possible to support arrays of domain which do not have > constraints? > Or such partial support is worser than prohibiting arrays of domains at all? I don't know that domains without constraints gets you terribly much. At that point you could just create a brand new type using all the existing infrastructure (though admittedly that's a LOT more work than CREATE DOMAIN). I definitely think that domains should work the way you're envisioning. To me, they should be the exact same thing as any other type, except that they have constraints attached and a different named. You should be able to use them everywhere and in every way that you currently use a type. Ideally you'd even be able to create casts against them. I'm not suggesting you try and fix all those things at once, but I don't think we should add only partial support for arrays of domains. If you can have a domain array, it should work exactly how you'd expect, including all of the constraint checking. Before focusing further on the code, I think you should focus on adding appropriate regression tests to make sure things work correctly. I'm not sure what's currently tested, but what comes to mind is making certain that constraints work with a domain array when used both by themselves and as part of a composite type: - as an argument to a function - inside a sql function - as a plpgsql variable - inside a plpgsql function - as a table column So that's 5 x 2 (once for domain[], once for create type blah(x domain[])) test cases. There might be some other cases that are missing (what cast testing needs to happen?) -- Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com 855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532) mobile: 512-569-9461