Thread: results being col wise rather than row wise
HI All,<br /><br /> I have 5 tables which have different columns as shown below, each table has a different case column,<br/> i want to retrieve sample related information as follows:<br /><br /> pid | xindex | yindex | height Index |flag | case1 | case 2.....etc<br /><br /> But i get this queer result:<br /><font face="Courier New,Courier,mono">pid | xindex | yindex | Height Index | flag | case<br />-------------+--------+--------+-------------+-------------+---------<br/>102234 | 411 | 271 | 9 | 1 | 80<br />102234 | 411 | 271 | 9 | 1 | 83<br />102234 | 411 | 271 | 9 | 1 | 87<br />102234 | 411 | 271 | 9 | 1 | 101<br />102234 | 411 | 271 | 9 | 1 | 129<br />102234 | 411 | 271 | 9 | 1 | 91<br />102234 | 411 | 271 | 9 | 1 | 120.3<br /><br /> Why is the resultin a column wise rather than row wise???!!!!<br /> Could somebody explain why the redundancy with respect to pi, xindex,yindex, height index, flag but the CORRECT values for the cases but not in the order expected!!!<br /><br /><br />Thanks,<br /> Hrishi<br /></font>
On Wed, 29 Mar 2006, Hrishikesh Deshmukh wrote: > HI All, > > I have 5 tables which have different columns as shown below, each table has > a different case column, > i want to retrieve sample related information as follows: > > pid | xindex | yindex | height Index | flag | case1 | case 2.....etc > > But i get this queer result: > pid | xindex | yindex | Height Index | flag | case > -------------+--------+--------+-------------+-------------+--------- > 102234 | 411 | 271 | 9 | 1 | 80 > 102234 | 411 | 271 | 9 | 1 | 83 > 102234 | 411 | 271 | 9 | 1 | 87 > 102234 | 411 | 271 | 9 | 1 | 101 > 102234 | 411 | 271 | 9 | 1 | 129 > 102234 | 411 | 271 | 9 | 1 | 91 > 102234 | 411 | 271 | 9 | 1 | 120.3 > > Why is the result in a column wise rather than row wise???!!!! > Could somebody explain why the redundancy with respect to pi, xindex, > yindex, height index, flag but the CORRECT values for the cases but not in > the order expected!!! Can you give us the specific schema and query you used? We're only going to be guessing otherwise.