Thread: [PostOffice: NDN: Re: [PERFORM] how to plan for vacuum?]
Isn't there a way to get majordomo to automatically kill these
subscriptions? I know mailman can do it...
----- Forwarded message from PostOffice -----
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.6 (2006-10-03) on noel.decibel.org
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_60,HTML_MESSAGE,
HTML_TITLE_EMPTY autolearn=no version=3.1.6
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 10:54:58 -0500
Subject: NDN: Re: [PERFORM] how to plan for vacuum?
X-Mailer: FirstClass 8.3 (build 8.278)
X-FC-Icon-ID: 2031
X-FC-SERVER-TZ: 15729388
X-FC-MachineGenerated: true
To: "Jim C. Nasby" <jim@nasby.net>
From: PostOffice
Sorry. Your message could not be delivered to:
Martin Chayer (Mailbox or Conference is full.)
----- End forwarded message -----
--
Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect jim@nasby.net
512.569.9461 (cell) http://jim.nasby.net
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> Isn't there a way to get majordomo to automatically kill these
> subscriptions? I know mailman can do it...
Can somebody put the nomail bit on this guy. I am constantly getting
errors from him and I am tired of it.
Joshua D. Drake
>
> ----- Forwarded message from PostOffice -----
>
> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.6 (2006-10-03) on noel.decibel.org
> X-Spam-Level: *
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_60,HTML_MESSAGE,
> HTML_TITLE_EMPTY autolearn=no version=3.1.6
> Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 10:54:58 -0500
> Subject: NDN: Re: [PERFORM] how to plan for vacuum?
> X-Mailer: FirstClass 8.3 (build 8.278)
> X-FC-Icon-ID: 2031
> X-FC-SERVER-TZ: 15729388
> X-FC-MachineGenerated: true
> To: "Jim C. Nasby" <jim@nasby.net>
> From: PostOffice
>
> Sorry. Your message could not be delivered to:
>
> Martin Chayer (Mailbox or Conference is full.)
>
>
> ----- End forwarded message -----
>
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
On Thursday 25 January 2007 11:08, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> > Isn't there a way to get majordomo to automatically kill these
> > subscriptions? I know mailman can do it...
>
> Can somebody put the nomail bit on this guy. I am constantly getting
> errors from him and I am tired of it.
>
You want the nomail bit added on Jim?
--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
Robert Treat wrote:
> On Thursday 25 January 2007 11:08, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> Jim C. Nasby wrote:
>>> Isn't there a way to get majordomo to automatically kill these
>>> subscriptions? I know mailman can do it...
>> Can somebody put the nomail bit on this guy. I am constantly getting
>> errors from him and I am tired of it.
>>
>
> You want the nomail bit added on Jim?
Hah! Of course not...
Martin Chayer (Mailbox or Conference is full.)
>
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes: > Robert Treat wrote: >> You want the nomail bit added on Jim? > Hah! Of course not... > Martin Chayer (Mailbox or Conference is full.) Chayer's addy has been bouncing mail since mid-November; here's the headers from the first instance in my logs:
On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 02:10:43AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > day or two, because bouncing to the From: author instead of the > envelope sender is Absolutely Not Acceptable. I forebore from Well, not Absolutely Not. RFC2822 saith The translation algorithm used to convert mail from the Internet protocols to another environment's protocol SHOULD ensurethat error messages from the foreign mail environment are delivered to the return path from the SMTP envelope, notto the sender listed in the "From:" field (or other fields) of the RFC 822 message. But of course, that SHOULD surely permits receiving servers to decide to reject future mail from a system that uses the From: instead of the return path from the envelope. Andrew "RFC Weenie" Sullivan -- Andrew Sullivan | ajs@crankycanuck.ca The whole tendency of modern prose is away from concreteness. --George Orwell