Thread: 9.5/9.6 branching
I think the feature freeze and the long window to the next minor releases make this a good time to branch 9.5/9.6 (so that master is for 9.6). Any concerns?
Peter Eisentraut wrote: > I think the feature freeze and the long window to the next minor > releases make this a good time to branch 9.5/9.6 (so that master is for > 9.6). Any concerns? Sounds good. Do we need to change default branch in git.pg.org or something? -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Le 11 avr. 2016 9:53 PM, "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> a écrit :
>
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > I think the feature freeze and the long window to the next minor
> > releases make this a good time to branch 9.5/9.6 (so that master is for
> > 9.6). Any concerns?
>
> Sounds good.
+1
> Do we need to change default branch in git.pg.org or
> something?
>
On 04/11/2016 03:53 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> I think the feature freeze and the long window to the next minor >> releases make this a good time to branch 9.5/9.6 (so that master is for >> 9.6). Any concerns? > > Sounds good. Do we need to change default branch in git.pg.org or > something? The branch has been created. The default branch should be set back to master.
Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On 04/11/2016 03:53 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > Peter Eisentraut wrote: > >> I think the feature freeze and the long window to the next minor > >> releases make this a good time to branch 9.5/9.6 (so that master is for > >> 9.6). Any concerns? > > > > Sounds good. Do we need to change default branch in git.pg.org or > > something? > > The branch has been created. The default branch should be set back to > master. Done. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services