Thread: Re: [HACKERS] switching documentation build to XSLT
Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > If you find any changes in the output that bother you, let pgsql-docs know. The table of contents for Appendix F has gotten more verbose, in a way that doesn't seem like an improvement; compare https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/static/contrib.html https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/contrib.html On the other hand, the table of contents disappeared entirely in dblink, which is definitely not an improvement: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/static/dblink.html https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/dblink.html regards, tom lane
Hello, Attached patches fix the issues. I wrote about these differences before -- see issues 12 and 20 in http://oc.postgrespro.ru/index.php/s/Gj2PGZ9IHUbDC5t/download (See https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/4ffd72d6-8ab6-37c6-d7d5-dfed8967c0fc%40gmail.com) If you find that some other differences are not improvements too, I can prepare corresponding patches. Best regards, Alexander 21.11.2016 22:36, Tom Lane пишет: > Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes: >> If you find any changes in the output that bother you, let pgsql-docs know. > The table of contents for Appendix F has gotten more verbose, in a way > that doesn't seem like an improvement; compare > > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/static/contrib.html > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/contrib.html > > On the other hand, the table of contents disappeared entirely in > dblink, which is definitely not an improvement: > > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/static/dblink.html > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/dblink.html > > regards, tom lane > >