Thread: [pgsql-www] GSoC 2017 update
All, Please find attached an update which I'm preparing for our GSoC page for 2017. Would be great if someone could take a look and make sure I've not done anything horrible, it's mostly just updates and a bit of rewording. Barring objections, I plan to push this sometime soon as it'd be good to have it updated before we formally submit our application to Google. Apologies for not having it done sooner, I hadn't realized that we had such a page (or, more likely, simply forgot from last year that it existed). Thanks! Stephen
Attachment
> On 08 Feb 2017, at 22:23, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote: > > All, > > Please find attached an update which I'm preparing for our GSoC page for > 2017. > > Would be great if someone could take a look and make sure I've not done > anything horrible, it's mostly just updates and a bit of rewording. Sorry, I was too slow in reviewing. The pushed patch leaves two blocks open which breaks validation but shouldn’t impact rendering. Fixed in attached patch. cheers ./daniel -- Sent via pgsql-www mailing list (pgsql-www@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-www
Attachment
Daniel, * Daniel Gustafsson (daniel@yesql.se) wrote: > > On 08 Feb 2017, at 22:23, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote: > > Please find attached an update which I'm preparing for our GSoC page for > > 2017. > > > > Would be great if someone could take a look and make sure I've not done > > anything horrible, it's mostly just updates and a bit of rewording. > > Sorry, I was too slow in reviewing. The pushed patch leaves two blocks open > which breaks validation but shouldn’t impact rendering. Fixed in attached > patch. The rendering did look correct (actually, it looked better than it was before because I had fixed another unclosed block that had intended things incorrectly). These changes look good on an initial look, I'll check it in more detail and push it when I get to work. Thanks Daniel! Stephen
Daniel, * Daniel Gustafsson (daniel@yesql.se) wrote: > > On 08 Feb 2017, at 22:23, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote: > > Would be great if someone could take a look and make sure I've not done > > anything horrible, it's mostly just updates and a bit of rewording. > > Sorry, I was too slow in reviewing. The pushed patch leaves two blocks open > which breaks validation but shouldn’t impact rendering. Fixed in attached > patch. Pushed, thanks! Stephen