Thread: [pgsql-www] doc-searching for v10 broken
The search at https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/index.html does not find anything. The produced url is: https://www.postgresql.org/search/?u=%2Fdocs%2F10.0%2F&q=select which (apparently) should be: https://www.postgresql.org/search/?u=%2Fdocs%2F10.0%2F&q=select i.e., s/10/10.0/ Erik Rijkers
Oops I typoed a url, but the problem is real. Again: The search at https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/index.html does not find anything. The produced url is: https://www.postgresql.org/search/?u=%2Fdocs%2F10%2F&q=select which (apparently) should be: https://www.postgresql.org/search/?u=%2Fdocs%2F10.0%2F&q=select i.e., s/10/10.0/ Erik Rijkers
On Sun, May 28, 2017 at 8:09 AM, Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl> wrote:
Oops I typoed a url, but the problem is real.
Again:
The search at
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/index.html
does not find anything.
The produced url is:
https://www.postgresql.org/search/?u=%2Fdocs%2F10%2F&q=selec t
which (apparently) should be:
https://www.postgresql.org/search/?u=%2Fdocs%2F10.0%2F&q=sel ect
i.e., s/10/10.0/
That is indeed broken. I've spotted the problem, will get a fix in as soon as I have fixed my testing environment.
//Magnus
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> On Sun, May 28, 2017 at 8:09 AM, Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl> wrote:
>> i.e., s/10/10.0/
> That is indeed broken. I've spotted the problem, will get a fix in as soon
> as I have fixed my testing environment.
Don't we want it to go the other way around, ie the documentation URL for
v10 should contain "10" not "10.0"?
regards, tom lane
On Sun, May 28, 2017 at 11:03 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> On Sun, May 28, 2017 at 8:09 AM, Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl> wrote:
>> i.e., s/10/10.0/
> That is indeed broken. I've spotted the problem, will get a fix in as soon
> as I have fixed my testing environment.
Don't we want it to go the other way around, ie the documentation URL for
v10 should contain "10" not "10.0"?
Yes. I was a bit short in my response. The problem is that it's trying to index it under 10.0, which has no content. And then the search tries to use 10.
On Sun, May 28, 2017 at 11:38 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
On Sun, May 28, 2017 at 11:03 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> On Sun, May 28, 2017 at 8:09 AM, Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl> wrote:
>> i.e., s/10/10.0/
> That is indeed broken. I've spotted the problem, will get a fix in as soon
> as I have fixed my testing environment.
Don't we want it to go the other way around, ie the documentation URL for
v10 should contain "10" not "10.0"?Yes. I was a bit short in my response. The problem is that it's trying to index it under 10.0, which has no content. And then the search tries to use 10.
Fix has been deployed, and seems to work now.
Thanks for the report!