Thread: RE: FW: RepMgr version numbering on CentOS

> So, you are right -- I am adding Release: tag. They should add it as well.

Super, thanks.  I've logged an issue on their GitHub, and hopefully they will pick it up:

https://github.com/2ndQuadrant/repmgr/issues/575

Actually, on second reading I'm not quite sure what tag you're adding.  Here's what I currently see listed in the two
repo's:

repmgr10.x86_64       4.4-1.el7            2ndquadrant-dl-default-release-pg10
repmgr10.x86_64       4.4.0-1.rhel7        pgdg10

They both have a <version>-<tag>, but in the PDGD one the version is v4.4.0 (three digits), and in 2ndQ it's v4.4 (two
digits).

Greg.



________________________________

This e-mail, including accompanying communications and attachments, is strictly confidential and only for the intended
recipient.Any retention, use or disclosure not expressly authorised by IHSMarkit is prohibited. This email is subject
toall waivers and other terms at the following link: https://ihsmarkit.com/Legal/EmailDisclaimer.html
 

Please visit www.ihsmarkit.com/about/contact-us.html for contact information on our offices worldwide.

Hi Greg,

On Mon, 2019-07-15 at 16:02 +0000, Greg Clough wrote:
> Actually, on second reading I'm not quite sure what tag you're adding.
> Here's what I currently see listed in the two repo's:
>
> repmgr10.x86_64       4.4-1.el7            2ndquadrant-dl-default-release-
> pg10
> repmgr10.x86_64       4.4.0-1.rhel7        pgdg10
>
> They both have a <version>-<tag>, but in the PDGD one the version is v4.4.0
> (three digits), and in 2ndQ it's v4.4 (two digits).

Heh. Let me clarify:

Per


https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=pgrpms.git;a=history;f=rpm/redhat/master/repmgr/master/repmgr.spec;h=02cd1a9ef73b4b5aee87c4c31e913125e407e4d2;hb=HEAD

Repmgr folks used to have 3-digit version numbers. That is why I still use that
scheme. Apparently they now switched to 2-digit version numbers, but as you can
see from

https://repmgr.org/download/

They have both 4.4.0 and 4.4 in the download directory (I assume they are
symlinks), and that is why my packages never failed to build.

If they will keep 2-digit version numbering in the future as well, I can
release next package with 2 digits.

Cheers,
--
Devrim Gündüz
Open Source Solution Architect, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR