Thread: Installing Postgis25_11
When I try to install PostGIS version 2.5 to a Postgresql-11 installation on Fedora 32 I get warning that nothing provides for these packages:
- nothing provides libproj.so.19()(64bit) needed by postgis25_11-2.5.4-1.f32.x86_64
- nothing provides libSFCGAL.so.1()(64bit) needed by postgis25_11-2.5.4-1.f32.x86_64
- nothing provides SFCGAL needed by postgis25_11-2.5.4-1.f32.x86_64
- nothing provides gdal30-libs >= 3.0.4 needed by postgis25_11-2.5.4-1.f32.x86_64
- nothing provides geos38 >= 3.8.1 needed by postgis25_11-2.5.4-1.f32.x86_64
- nothing provides proj70 >= 7.0.0 needed by postgis25_11-2.5.4-1.f32.x86_64
- nothing provides libSFCGAL.so.1()(64bit) needed by postgis25_11-2.5.4-1.f32.x86_64
- nothing provides SFCGAL needed by postgis25_11-2.5.4-1.f32.x86_64
- nothing provides gdal30-libs >= 3.0.4 needed by postgis25_11-2.5.4-1.f32.x86_64
- nothing provides geos38 >= 3.8.1 needed by postgis25_11-2.5.4-1.f32.x86_64
- nothing provides proj70 >= 7.0.0 needed by postgis25_11-2.5.4-1.f32.x86_64
The yum repository [1] doesn't contain packages like these or does Fedora.
Any recommendation on how to proceed?
Thanks in advance,
I guess it is long route, once I was setting up POSTGIS on one of our cluster. I had to install all of these components by downloading them from their sources.
Regards,
Virendra
On Monday, May 4, 2020, 4:40:53 PM PDT, Clifford Snow <clifford@snowandsnow.us> wrote:
When I try to install PostGIS version 2.5 to a Postgresql-11 installation on Fedora 32 I get warning that nothing provides for these packages:
- nothing provides libproj.so.19()(64bit) needed by postgis25_11-2.5.4-1.f32.x86_64
- nothing provides libSFCGAL.so.1()(64bit) needed by postgis25_11-2.5.4-1.f32.x86_64
- nothing provides SFCGAL needed by postgis25_11-2.5.4-1.f32.x86_64
- nothing provides gdal30-libs >= 3.0.4 needed by postgis25_11-2.5.4-1.f32.x86_64
- nothing provides geos38 >= 3.8.1 needed by postgis25_11-2.5.4-1.f32.x86_64
- nothing provides proj70 >= 7.0.0 needed by postgis25_11-2.5.4-1.f32.x86_64
- nothing provides libSFCGAL.so.1()(64bit) needed by postgis25_11-2.5.4-1.f32.x86_64
- nothing provides SFCGAL needed by postgis25_11-2.5.4-1.f32.x86_64
- nothing provides gdal30-libs >= 3.0.4 needed by postgis25_11-2.5.4-1.f32.x86_64
- nothing provides geos38 >= 3.8.1 needed by postgis25_11-2.5.4-1.f32.x86_64
- nothing provides proj70 >= 7.0.0 needed by postgis25_11-2.5.4-1.f32.x86_64
The yum repository [1] doesn't contain packages like these or does Fedora.
Any recommendation on how to proceed?
Thanks in advance,
On Mon, 2020-05-04 at 16:40 -0700, Clifford Snow wrote: > When I try to install PostGIS version 2.5 to a Postgresql-11 installation on Fedora 32 I get warning that nothing providesfor these packages: > - nothing provides libproj.so.19()(64bit) needed by postgis25_11-2.5.4-1.f32.x86_64 > - nothing provides libSFCGAL.so.1()(64bit) needed by postgis25_11-2.5.4-1.f32.x86_64 > - nothing provides SFCGAL needed by postgis25_11-2.5.4-1.f32.x86_64 > - nothing provides gdal30-libs >= 3.0.4 needed by postgis25_11-2.5.4-1.f32.x86_64 > - nothing provides geos38 >= 3.8.1 needed by postgis25_11-2.5.4-1.f32.x86_64 > - nothing provides proj70 >= 7.0.0 needed by postgis25_11-2.5.4-1.f32.x86_64 > > The yum repository [1] doesn't contain packages like these or does Fedora. > > Any recommendation on how to proceed? There has been a change in the arrangement of the files in the repository recently. You probably need to upgrade "pgdg-gedora-repo": dnf upgrade pgdg-gedora-repo See https://postgr.es/m/3758d9fb098f1109db3c64d4e40e109df3b7dad7.camel@gunduz.org for details. Yours, Laurenz Albe -- Cybertec | https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com
|
On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 1:23 AM Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at> wrote:
There has been a change in the arrangement of the files in the repository
recently. You probably need to upgrade "pgdg-gedora-repo":
dnf upgrade pgdg-gedora-repo
See https://postgr.es/m/3758d9fb098f1109db3c64d4e40e109df3b7dad7.camel@gunduz.org
for details.
pgdg-fedora-repo is current. None of the rpms in the repository provide the library files needed.
Best,
Clifford
On 5/5/20 8:09 AM, Clifford Snow wrote: > > > Laurenz Albe (laurenz.albe@cybertec.at > <mailto:laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>), pgsql-general@postgresql.org > <mailto:pgsql-general@postgresql.org> > Draft saved > > Make sure this is someone you trust. laurenz.albe@cybertec.at > <mailto:laurenz.albe@cybertec.at> does not belong to your organization > and is not in your contacts. > > > > On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 1:23 AM Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at > <mailto:laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>> wrote: > > > There has been a change in the arrangement of the files in the > repository > recently. You probably need to upgrade "pgdg-gedora-repo": > > dnf upgrade pgdg-gedora-repo > > See > https://postgr.es/m/3758d9fb098f1109db3c64d4e40e109df3b7dad7.camel@gunduz.org > for details. > > > pgdg-fedora-repo is current. None of the rpms in the repository provide > the library files needed. So to be clear you did: dnf update pgdg-fedora-repo Have you manually edited the repo file? > > Best, > Clifford > -- > @osm_washington > www.snowandsnow.us <https://www.snowandsnow.us> > OpenStreetMap: Maps with a human touch -- Adrian Klaver adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 8:37 AM Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com> wrote:
So to be clear you did:
dnf update pgdg-fedora-repo
Have you manually edited the repo file?
Adrian,
Thanks - I did actually do the update, but nothing changed. What I noticed when looking at the /etc/yum.repo folder, there was a pgdg-fedora-repo.rpmsave. Making the rpmsave the repo file solved the issue.
Thanks for your help,
Clifford