Thread: BUG #17149: About --skip option of pg_amcheck command
The following bug has been logged on the website: Bug reference: 17149 Logged by: Chen Jiaoqian Email address: chenjq.jy@fujitsu.com PostgreSQL version: 14beta3 Operating system: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 7.8 Description: Hi, Author In PG14 beta3, when I use pg_amcheck command and specify the value of the option --skip as "none", "all-visible" or "all-frozen", an error occurs. The official website is described as follows: > --skip=option > If all-frozen is given, table corruption checks will skip over pages in all tables that are marked as all frozen. > If all-visible is given, table corruption checks will skip over pages in all tables that are marked as all visible. > By default, no pages are skipped. This can be specified as none, but since this is the default, it need not be mentioned. When I specify the "none" value for --skip option, the following error occurs: [postgres14@localhost ~]$ pg_amcheck -p 51403 -d postgres -t tb01 --skip=none pg_amcheck: error: invalid argument for option --skip [postgres14@localhost ~]$ When I specify the "all-visible" or "all-frozen" value for --skip option, take "all-visible" as an example, the following error occurs: [postgres14@localhost ~]$ pg_amcheck -p 51403 -d postgres -t tb01 --skip=all-visible 2021-08-16 04:59:04.571 EDT [4689] ERROR: invalid skip option 2021-08-16 04:59:04.571 EDT [4689] HINT: Valid skip options are "all-visible", "all-frozen", and "none". 2021-08-16 04:59:04.571 EDT [4689] STATEMENT: SELECT blkno, offnum, attnum, msg FROM "public".verify_heapam( relation := 16396, on_error_stop := false, check_toast := true, skip := 'all visible') heap table "postgres"."public"."tb01": ERROR: invalid skip option HINT: Valid skip options are "all-visible", "all-frozen", and "none". [postgres14@localhost ~]$ Regards.
> On 17 Aug 2021, at 06:36, PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org> wrote: > When I specify the "none" value for --skip option, the following error > occurs: > [postgres14@localhost ~]$ pg_amcheck -p 51403 -d postgres -t tb01 > --skip=none > pg_amcheck: error: invalid argument for option --skip > [postgres14@localhost ~]$ Nice catch, this should indeed be handled. Fixed in the attached. > When I specify the "all-visible" or "all-frozen" value for --skip > option, take "all-visible" as an example, the following error occurs: > [postgres14@localhost ~]$ pg_amcheck -p 51403 -d postgres -t tb01 > --skip=all-visible > 2021-08-16 04:59:04.571 EDT [4689] ERROR: invalid skip option > 2021-08-16 04:59:04.571 EDT [4689] HINT: Valid skip options are > "all-visible", "all-frozen", and "none". Indeed, the attached fixes this as well. Barring objections I will apply the attached backpatched to 14. -- Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/
Attachment
On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 4:54 PM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> wrote: > > > On 17 Aug 2021, at 06:36, PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org> wrote: > > > When I specify the "none" value for --skip option, the following error > > occurs: > > [postgres14@localhost ~]$ pg_amcheck -p 51403 -d postgres -t tb01 > > --skip=none > > pg_amcheck: error: invalid argument for option --skip > > [postgres14@localhost ~]$ > > Nice catch, this should indeed be handled. Fixed in the attached. > > > When I specify the "all-visible" or "all-frozen" value for --skip > > option, take "all-visible" as an example, the following error occurs: > > [postgres14@localhost ~]$ pg_amcheck -p 51403 -d postgres -t tb01 > > --skip=all-visible > > 2021-08-16 04:59:04.571 EDT [4689] ERROR: invalid skip option > > 2021-08-16 04:59:04.571 EDT [4689] HINT: Valid skip options are > > "all-visible", "all-frozen", and "none". > > Indeed, the attached fixes this as well. > > Barring objections I will apply the attached backpatched to 14. The patch looks good to me. Regards, -- Masahiko Sawada EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com/
> On 18 Aug 2021, at 07:30, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 4:54 PM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> wrote: >> Barring objections I will apply the attached backpatched to 14. > > The patch looks good to me. Pushed to master and v14, thanks for review! -- Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/