Thread: [PATCH] Add .idea to gitignore for JetBrains CLion
From 6d10dafdd7c7789eddd7fd72ca22dfde74febe23 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ali Sajjad <sasrizavi@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2022 06:03:11 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] Add .idea to gitignore for JetBrains CLion
---
.gitignore | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 1c0f3e5e35..7118b90f25 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ win32ver.rc
*.exe
lib*dll.def
lib*.pc
+**/.idea
# Local excludes in root directory
/GNUmakefile
--
2.34.1
From: Ali Sajjad <sasrizavi@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2022 06:03:11 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] Add .idea to gitignore for JetBrains CLion
---
.gitignore | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 1c0f3e5e35..7118b90f25 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ win32ver.rc
*.exe
lib*dll.def
lib*.pc
+**/.idea
# Local excludes in root directory
/GNUmakefile
--
2.34.1
Probably I'm the first one building PostgreSQL on CLion.
I searched the commit fest app and there's already someone who has made this.
On Sun, Dec 4, 2022 at 7:28 AM Sayyid Ali Sajjad Rizavi <sasrizavi@gmail.com> wrote:
From 6d10dafdd7c7789eddd7fd72ca22dfde74febe23 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ali Sajjad <sasrizavi@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2022 06:03:11 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] Add .idea to gitignore for JetBrains CLion
---
.gitignore | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 1c0f3e5e35..7118b90f25 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ win32ver.rc
*.exe
lib*dll.def
lib*.pc
+**/.idea
# Local excludes in root directory
/GNUmakefile
--
2.34.1Probably I'm the first one building PostgreSQL on CLion.
Sayyid Ali Sajjad Rizavi <sasrizavi@gmail.com> writes: > +**/.idea Our policy is that the in-tree .gitignore files should only hide files that are build artifacts of standard build processes. Something like this belongs in your personal ~/.gitexclude, instead. (BTW, perhaps we should remove the entries targeting ".sl" extensions? AFAIK that was only for HP-UX, which is now desupported.) regards, tom lane
> On 4 Dec 2022, at 16:35, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Sayyid Ali Sajjad Rizavi <sasrizavi@gmail.com> writes: >> +**/.idea > > Our policy is that the in-tree .gitignore files should only hide > files that are build artifacts of standard build processes. > Something like this belongs in your personal ~/.gitexclude, > instead. Since this comes up every now and again, I wonder if it's worth documenting this in our .gitignore along the lines of: --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -1,3 +1,7 @@ +# This contains ignores for build artifacts from standard builds, +# auxiliary files from local workflows should be ignored locally +# with $GIT_DIR/info/exclude + > (BTW, perhaps we should remove the entries targeting ".sl" > extensions? AFAIK that was only for HP-UX, which is now > desupported.) +1. Grepping through the .gitignores in the tree didn't reveal anything else that seemed to have outlived its usefulness. -- Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/
Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> writes: >> On 4 Dec 2022, at 16:35, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Our policy is that the in-tree .gitignore files should only hide >> files that are build artifacts of standard build processes. >> Something like this belongs in your personal ~/.gitexclude, >> instead. > Since this comes up every now and again, I wonder if it's worth documenting > this in our .gitignore along the lines of: Good idea. >> (BTW, perhaps we should remove the entries targeting ".sl" >> extensions? AFAIK that was only for HP-UX, which is now >> desupported.) > +1. Grepping through the .gitignores in the tree didn't reveal anything else > that seemed to have outlived its usefulness. I'll make it so. Thanks for checking. regards, tom lane