Thread: Fix inconsistency in the pg_buffercache documentation
Hi hackers, While working on [1], I noticed an inconsistency in the pg_buffercache documentation: ba2a3c2302f1 missed to add "the" before the pg_buffercache_numa() function introduction. PFA a tiny patch to add it for consistency purpose. Should be back-patched to 18 where pg_buffercache_numa() has been introduced. [1]: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/Z/fFA2heH6lpSLlt%40ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal Regards, -- Bertrand Drouvot PostgreSQL Contributors Team RDS Open Source Databases Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
Attachment
> On 2 Jul 2025, at 08:23, Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi hackers, > > While working on [1], I noticed an inconsistency in the pg_buffercache > documentation: ba2a3c2302f1 missed to add "the" before the pg_buffercache_numa() > function introduction. Thanks, that does indeed look like an omission. There seems to be a few more on the same page however, how about the attached? -- Daniel Gustafsson
Attachment
Hi, On Wed, Jul 02, 2025 at 09:55:52AM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: > > On 2 Jul 2025, at 08:23, Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi hackers, > > > > While working on [1], I noticed an inconsistency in the pg_buffercache > > documentation: ba2a3c2302f1 missed to add "the" before the pg_buffercache_numa() > > function introduction. > > Thanks, that does indeed look like an omission. Thanks for looking at it! > There seems to be a few more > on the same page however, Indeed, there is multiple kind of inconsistency that are worth to fix. > how about the attached? LGTM. Regards, -- Bertrand Drouvot PostgreSQL Contributors Team RDS Open Source Databases Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
> On 2 Jul 2025, at 10:06, Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 02, 2025 at 09:55:52AM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: >> how about the attached? > > LGTM. Thanks, committed. -- Daniel Gustafsson