Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Should we improve "PID XXXX is not a PostgreSQL server process" warning for pg_terminate_backend(<>)? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bossart, Nathan
Subject Re: Should we improve "PID XXXX is not a PostgreSQL server process" warning for pg_terminate_backend(<>)?
Date
Msg-id 52DA3827-E459-4C54-A603-B3C2C3418732@amazon.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Should we improve "PID XXXX is not a PostgreSQL server process" warning for pg_terminate_backend(<>)?  (Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Should we improve "PID XXXX is not a PostgreSQL server process" warning for pg_terminate_backend(<>)?
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On 11/18/21, 8:27 PM, "Bharath Rupireddy" <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com> wrote:
> Here's the v4 patch with the above changes, the output looks like [1].
> Please review it further.

I agree with Tom.  I would just s/server/backend/ (as per the
attached) and call it a day.

Nathan
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: Is there a way (except from server logs) to know the kind of on-going/last checkpoint?
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: RecoveryInProgress() has critical side effects