Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: explain analyze output with parallel workers - question aboutmeaning of information for explain.depesz.com - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: explain analyze output with parallel workers - question aboutmeaning of information for explain.depesz.com
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoaFaWQKoEAt9O1huKoQ-0ofOiOkfeUAnzY-UHyygQ2CMw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: explain analyze output with parallel workers - question aboutmeaning of information for explain.depesz.com  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: explain analyze output with parallel workers - question aboutmeaning of information for explain.depesz.com
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 9:37 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Uh, should I just revert that commit entirely first, and then we can
>> commit the new fix afterward?
>
> Yes. I have already extracted the test case of that commit to the new
> patch which is what we need from that commit.

OK, done.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Inconsistency in plpgsql's error context reports
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Parallel Index Scan vs BTP_DELETED and BTP_HALF_DEAD