On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 2:32 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 9:37 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Uh, should I just revert that commit entirely first, and then we can
>>> commit the new fix afterward?
>>
>> Yes. I have already extracted the test case of that commit to the new
>> patch which is what we need from that commit.
>
> OK, done.
>
Thanks. I think now we can proceed with
fix_accum_instr_parallel_workers_v8.patch posted above which will fix
the original issue and the problem we have found in sort and hash
nodes.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
