Re: zheap storage_engine parameter, shouldn't this raise an error? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: zheap storage_engine parameter, shouldn't this raise an error?
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1JF-0ufA0e3ssG2vs1a5YvuDnWnBexj1v_K2WF2Q3xBNA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: zheap storage_engine parameter, shouldn't this raise an error?  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 3:21 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 3:13 PM Daniel Westermann <daniel.westermann@dbi-services.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> I believe this should raise an error or at least a warning?
>>
>
> Sure, if we want we can raise the error or warning for this, but this is a parameter mainly to test zheap with
existingset of regression tests.  I am not sure if we want to keep it or even if we want to have any such parameter for
testingpurpose in what form it will be present.  So, adding more checks at this stage around this parameter doesn't
seemadvisable to me. 
>

Instead of starting new threads for each report, it might be better to
report it on the zheap thread [1].

[1] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAA4eK1%2BYtM5vxzSM2NZm%2BpC37MCwyvtkmJrO_yRBQeZDp9Wa2w%40mail.gmail.com

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: zheap storage_engine parameter, shouldn't this raise an error?
Next
From: Fabien COELHO
Date:
Subject: Re: pgbench doc fix