> Perhaps CachedPlanType is
> misnamed, though, would it be more suited to name that as a sort of
> "origin" or "source" field concept? We want to know which which
> source we have retrieved a plan that a PlannedStmt refers to.
Hmm, I’m not sure I see this as an improvement. In my opinion,
CachedPlanType is a clear name that describes its purpose.
--
Sami
