Re: VACUUM (PARALLEL) option processing not using DefElem the way it was intended - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Rowley
Subject Re: VACUUM (PARALLEL) option processing not using DefElem the way it was intended
Date
Msg-id CAApHDvoxK8peDC1yZSekb8FdUqrKd6VnfTYm8-TP0xim9k9+dw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: VACUUM (PARALLEL) option processing not using DefElem the way it was intended  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 10 Oct 2025 at 06:35, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 9, 2025 at 5:02 AM Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de> wrote:
> > LGTM, thanks.
>
> LGTM too. Thank you!

Thank you to you both for looking. Pushed.

David



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: meson's in-tree libpq header search order vs -Dextra_include_dirs
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Buffer locking is special (hints, checksums, AIO writes)