Re: VACUUM (PARALLEL) option processing not using DefElem the way it was intended - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Masahiko Sawada
Subject Re: VACUUM (PARALLEL) option processing not using DefElem the way it was intended
Date
Msg-id CAD21AoCFRN6X0a8Yu7TzFaTq_H10HRj5p3KS6ZL_m2n3qf0-hQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: VACUUM (PARALLEL) option processing not using DefElem the way it was intended  (Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>)
Responses Re: VACUUM (PARALLEL) option processing not using DefElem the way it was intended
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Oct 9, 2025 at 5:02 AM Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de> wrote:
>
> On 2025-Oct-09, David Rowley wrote:
>
> > Ok, I've adjusted that in the attached.
>
> LGTM, thanks.

LGTM too. Thank you!

Regards,

--
Masahiko Sawada
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Adding some error context for lock wait failures
Next
From: John H
Date:
Subject: Re: Making pg_rewind faster